2016
DOI: 10.1057/9781137521811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Language Policy: Maintaining an Endangered Language in the Home

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
60
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…By using Malay, the mother both performs a figure through speech (Agha, , p. 39) which projects an image of motherhood at home who is worried about her child's health, and promotes Malay at home. Unlike some children in Smith‐Christmas () and Gafaranga () who could not speak Gaelic or Kinyarwanda, respectively, Amirah has an adequate level of proficiency to respond to her mother in Malay. Amirah, however, does not accommodate to her mother's language choice and answers in English (line 72).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By using Malay, the mother both performs a figure through speech (Agha, , p. 39) which projects an image of motherhood at home who is worried about her child's health, and promotes Malay at home. Unlike some children in Smith‐Christmas () and Gafaranga () who could not speak Gaelic or Kinyarwanda, respectively, Amirah has an adequate level of proficiency to respond to her mother in Malay. Amirah, however, does not accommodate to her mother's language choice and answers in English (line 72).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These cases, as they show, bring into focus the multi-layered and multi-sited nature of family dynamics when it comes to decisions about language use and learning, not only within the family itself, but also in their relationship with the wider society. FLP has also become an important area of research in language revitalization studies (see for example, King et al 2008;Smith-Christmas 2016;Nandi 2018) taking account of the "explicit and overt decisions parents make about language use and language learning as well as implicit processes that legitimize certain language and literacy practices over others in the home" (Fogle 2013: 83). Although initially described as explicit and overt, FLPs can also be de facto, informal and unplanned, as a default consequence of caregivers' ideological beliefs (Curdt-Christiansen 2014).…”
Section: New Speakers and Family Language Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith‐Christmas (, ) explores the dynamic nature of family language policy in language maintenance contexts by documenting how interactions are actively negotiated by both caregivers and children. In her case study of a Gaelic‐speaking grandmother and granddaughter, the author observes how, in order to maintain positive attitudes towards Gaelic, the grandmother oriented herself to interactions that leaned more towards the “English” side of the continuum than to the “Gaelic” monolingual side.…”
Section: Affective Factors Influencing Intergenerational Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Javi's reflections indicate common issues experienced by parents who follow the OPOL approach, which range from the concern of leaving aside the other parent as communicative partner to the arduous struggles in maintaining the minority language given the status of the majority language in the child's life, along with beliefs that the child will develop negative emotional valences towards the language (Smith‐Christmas, ).…”
Section: The Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%