2000
DOI: 10.1093/sf/79.2.523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Matters: Gender, Networks, and Entrepreneurial Outcomes

Abstract: Historically, men have enjoyed several advantages over women in their life chances. For example, men have had, on average, higher occupational status, a higher rate of self-employment, and higher incomes than women (Reskin 1993). Femaledominated occupations have been devalued, in part, because Americans consider work done by women less valuable, less important, and less difficult (England 1992). Men have also owned and controlled the great majority of businesses. In 1990 the self-employment rate 1 for men was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
432
4
20

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(473 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
17
432
4
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the productivity of women may be enhanced by creating awareness of the importance of relevant experience and knowledge for new venture success, advising them to acquire more experience in a wage-job in a similar sector or absorb relevant knowledge and learn from the experiences of successful entrepreneurs. Female entrepreneurs are more likely to ask family members for advice than their male counterparts (Marsden 1987;Greve and Salaff 2003), which may relate to the difficulty of expanding their networks to the male-dominated business circuits (Renzulli et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the productivity of women may be enhanced by creating awareness of the importance of relevant experience and knowledge for new venture success, advising them to acquire more experience in a wage-job in a similar sector or absorb relevant knowledge and learn from the experiences of successful entrepreneurs. Female entrepreneurs are more likely to ask family members for advice than their male counterparts (Marsden 1987;Greve and Salaff 2003), which may relate to the difficulty of expanding their networks to the male-dominated business circuits (Renzulli et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the family's influence on self-employment decisions has been explored mostly through the mechanisms of inter-generational transmission, explicating the role of parental influences (e.g. Aldrich et al, 1998;Dunn & Holtz-Eakin, 2000;Hout & Rosen, 2000;Renzulli, Aldrich & Moody, 2000;Sorensen, 2007). Yet, only few studies focused on the spousal influences, most of which work with narrowly selected samples, examining only married couples (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nee & Sanders, 1996;Brown et al, 2006) with simple linear probability models that do not account for the endogeneity that emerges when individuals are selected into selfemployment and marriage simultaneously (e.g. Borjas, 1986;Renzulli et al, 2000). Estimates on the cross-sectional data also confound the effects on entry and on survival in selfemployment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preference for entrepreneurship is associated with higher chances of second attempts Social network support Renzulli, Aldrich, & Moody, 2000 Women receive more donations from friends and family than men, but the amount of those donations do not differ Not in matched sample Successful completion of first project None on gender, but see Gompers et al, 2006 No difference Yes. Failures to complete first project decrease the chance of becoming a serial founder.…”
Section: Difference In Marginal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brush & Hisrich, 1987;Lerner et al, 1997) the nature of social networks (e.g. Renzulli, Aldrich, & Moody, 2000); and the ongoing success of earlier founding attempts. In order to determine whether our results are robust to accounting for such differences between men and women, we deployed a survey to measure these factors.…”
Section: Robustness To Alternative Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%