1985
DOI: 10.1080/01926188508251266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family measurement techniques: Locke marital adjustment scale and the dyadic adjustment scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Satisfaction subscale from the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS, Spanier, 1976) was used to assess self-reported romantic relationship quality. DAS reliability and validity is summarized by Bagarozzi (1985). The Satisfaction subscale has 10 six-point items, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .82 in our sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Satisfaction subscale from the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS, Spanier, 1976) was used to assess self-reported romantic relationship quality. DAS reliability and validity is summarized by Bagarozzi (1985). The Satisfaction subscale has 10 six-point items, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .82 in our sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The DAS (Spanier, 1976) was used to measure participant's retrospective evaluations of the quality of adjustment in the lost conjugal relationship. The DAS has shown a coefficient alpha of .96 (Spanier, 1976), as well as convergent and discriminate validity (Cohen, 1985;Heyman, Sayers, & Bellack, 1994). The Global Symptoms Index (GSI) of the Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R) (Derogatis, 1983) was used as a general measure of distress.…”
Section: Questionnaire Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With over 4100 research citations across varying cultures and populations, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Scale (MAT, Locke & Wallace, 1959) seems to be compared regularly with newly developed assessments and has withstood the test of time as a standard for assessing marital health (e.g., Ghoroghi et al, 2015;Jiang et al, 2013;Khatun et al, 2019). The MAT is a 15-statement, Likert-type self-report survey with variable scoring for each statement (potential total score range: 2 to 158) and has been validated as a reliable marital adjustment measure and comparable to more recent pay-per-use marriage adjustment measures despite its development over 50 years ago (Bagarozzi, 1985;Crane et al, 1990;Freeston & Pléchaty, 1997;Jiang et al, 2013). The MAT's Spearman-Brown split-half reliability was .90 (Locke & Wallace, 1959).…”
Section: Assessment Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%