2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family ownership and family involvement as antecedents of strategic action: A longitudinal study of initial international entry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In so doing, we provide new insights on the need to take into account different types of relationships and distinctions among family members with leading strategic decision‐making positions (Chrisman et al ., 2018; Daspit et al ., 2018; Fattoum‐Guedri et al ., 2018). Indeed, considering the distinction between family and non‐family managers, family and non‐family owners, active and passive family shareholders, and owners from different generations, we take into account their different motives and show that family members differ in terms of risk‐bearing according to their position in the business (Evert et al ., 2018), thus affecting whether the firm is more or less oriented towards growth. This helps further the debate on the heterogeneity of family firms (Chua et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In so doing, we provide new insights on the need to take into account different types of relationships and distinctions among family members with leading strategic decision‐making positions (Chrisman et al ., 2018; Daspit et al ., 2018; Fattoum‐Guedri et al ., 2018). Indeed, considering the distinction between family and non‐family managers, family and non‐family owners, active and passive family shareholders, and owners from different generations, we take into account their different motives and show that family members differ in terms of risk‐bearing according to their position in the business (Evert et al ., 2018), thus affecting whether the firm is more or less oriented towards growth. This helps further the debate on the heterogeneity of family firms (Chua et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the role of founding family ownership needs greater attention. In addition, as family ownership and family involvement “may substitute for each other in generating the ability for the family to strategically direct the firm in a family‐oriented, particularistic way” (Evert, Sears, Martin, & Payne, 2018: 4), a valuable area of future scholarship would be to understand the joint influence of governance factors on SME internationalization strategies. Along the same line, Arregle et al (2019) propose family structural factors as another potential source of heterogeneity.…”
Section: A Future Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we added another variable that is assumed to affect the probability of exporting (negatively), but it is assumed not to influence export performance. This variable was the selfdeclared measure "family firms with a family CEO" because prior literature reported that the involvement of family members in ownership and management of the business negatively influences the likelihood of initial international entry (Cerrato & Piva, 2012: 634;Evert, Sears, Martin, & Payne, 2018) given their greater focus on domestic markets (Gallo & Garcia Pont, 1996).…”
Section: Robustness Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%