A Quarter Century of Community Psychology 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8646-7_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family, Peer, and Neighborhood Influences on Academic Achievement among African-American Adolescents: One-Year Prospective Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
125
3
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
125
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other longitudinal studies in similar populations have shown that high attrition rates are common among urban and ethnic minority adolescents with low SES (Seidman et al, 1994;Gonzales et al, 1996), and therefore also expected in our study. To minimize missing data, follow-up administrations were made one month after the initial administration to reach those students that were absent the first time.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, other longitudinal studies in similar populations have shown that high attrition rates are common among urban and ethnic minority adolescents with low SES (Seidman et al, 1994;Gonzales et al, 1996), and therefore also expected in our study. To minimize missing data, follow-up administrations were made one month after the initial administration to reach those students that were absent the first time.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Further, several recent surveys of parenting practices in primarily African American samples have demonstrated that the level of environmental risk moderates the links between parental restriction of autonomy and adolescent adjustment. In high -risk contexts within these samples, parental restriction of autonomy during early and middle adolescence is linked with positive indices of adjustment, including higher levels of academic competence, decreased externalizing behaviors, and more positive self -worth (Baldwin et al, 1990 ;Gonzales, Cauce, Friedman, & Mason, 1996 ;Mason, Cauce, Gonzales, & Hiraga, 1996 ;Smetana, CampioneBarr, & Daddis, 2004 were high on undermining of cognitive/verbal autonomy as more trustworthy and accepting; teens from low -risk settings, however, viewed highly undermining mothers as more psychologically controlling, and they reported feeling more alienated from them (McElhaney & Allen, 2001 ). In this same study, higher levels of adolescents ' expressions of autonomy were linked to positive outcomes for low -risk teens (higher levels of competence with peers), but to negative outcomes for high -risk teens (higher levels of engagement in delinquent behaviors).…”
Section: Attachment Autonomy and Socioeconomic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this, parenting practices that emphasize democratic decision-making and foster a sense of autonomy may be more suitable for children from low risk environments, whereas they may be inappropriate for, or even detrimental to, youth living in more risky environments. Indeed, a number of studies have found that children and adolescents who live in more dangerous environments may benefit from high levels of parental control, whereas children living in less risky neighborhoods may experience negative effects of such restrictive control (Baldwin, Baldwin, & Cole, 1990;Baumrind, 1972;Furstenberg et al, 1999;Gonzales, Cauce, Friedman, & Mason, 1996). This may be especially true during early adolescence as youth are just beginning to confront decisions and experience situations that may have profound effects on their life trajectories.…”
Section: Family Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%