2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11013-005-4625-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Perceptions of Prognosis, Silence, and the “Suddenness” of Death

Abstract: Studies of end-of-life communication and care have emphasized physician-patient conversations, often to the exclusion of family members' discussions and interactions with providers, or with patients themselves. Relatively little is known therefore about families' experiences of end-of-life care in the hospital, or the concrete meanings and practices through which families conceive and define communication. Yet increasingly, family members are asked to serve as surrogates and thereby to participate in the facil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings echo the jarring and asynchronous patterns of interaction with the health care system described almost two decades ago by bioethicist Carol Levine, who noted how her visibility as a caregiver varied depending on how sick her disabled husband was (38). The strong role of the health care system in scripting interactions with patients' family members and friends noted in our study also resonates with findings of anthropologists Ann Russ and Sharon Kaufman (23). A bereaved wife enrolled in their study recalled how she would receive a phone call from the hospital "whenever they wanted consent for something" but otherwise had great difficulty reaching her husband's providers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings echo the jarring and asynchronous patterns of interaction with the health care system described almost two decades ago by bioethicist Carol Levine, who noted how her visibility as a caregiver varied depending on how sick her disabled husband was (38). The strong role of the health care system in scripting interactions with patients' family members and friends noted in our study also resonates with findings of anthropologists Ann Russ and Sharon Kaufman (23). A bereaved wife enrolled in their study recalled how she would receive a phone call from the hospital "whenever they wanted consent for something" but otherwise had great difficulty reaching her husband's providers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At the same time, the intensity of inpatient care during the final months of life continues to escalate, and the menu of different "life-prolonging" procedures offered late in the course of illness continues to expand (1,8,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Because many patients are unable to participate in medical decision-making as they approach the end of life (17), their family members and friends must now engage with the health care system in ways unimaginable for previous generations, assisting with ever more complex medical care and treatment decisions (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…106 In a critical situation, many patients and their families may look to professionals for information, and also guidance. 49,67,81,101,107,108 Far from being 'empowering' for patients and their families, responsibility for decisions of great difficulty and significance may be experienced as burdensome and subsequently subject to uncertainty and regret. 101,[109][110][111] Many studies describe the caution and circumspection that professionals employ when seeking cues about patient receptivity to ACP.…”
Section: Preferred Place Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49,67,81,101,107,108 Far from being 'empowering' for patients and their families, responsibility for decisions of great difficulty and significance may be experienced as burdensome and subsequently subject to uncertainty and regret. 101,[109][110][111] Many studies describe the caution and circumspection that professionals employ when seeking cues about patient receptivity to ACP. 67,87,88 Open questions may be used as opportunities, or 'offers', which patients may elect to take up or ignore, and the use of 'hypothetical' questions and scenarios may soften the impact of confronting difficult issues directly.…”
Section: Preferred Place Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caregiver priorities for high-quality EOL care typically include shared decision making, communication about patient wishes, awareness of prognosis, preparation for death, and avoiding prolonged death or suffering. 1,[15][16][17][18] The few existing instruments that measure quality of EOL care typically elicit the patient's experience rather than that of the caregiver. [19][20][21][22][23] Those that do assess caregivers, including the After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview from the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End-of-Life Care (TIME), 24 have omitted key factors of patient suffering and prolongation of death.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%