Family presence during resuscitation: A concise narrative review

Robertis, Edoardo De; Romano, Giovanni; Hinkelbein, Jochen; Piazza, Ornella; Sorriento, Giovanna

doi:10.1016/j.tacc.2017.06.001

“…Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) is a controversial circumstance that is gaining acceptance (3). The term FPDR was first described in the early 1980s (2,(4)(5)(6)(7), and has since been established in North America and the United Kingdom. The concept emerged later in other parts of the world in 2009 (4).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…More specifically, being present during resuscitation reduces anxiety and increases levels of satisfaction in relation to the delivered care., In addition, FPDR has not been demonstrated to contribute to resuscitation interruption (4). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies highlight that FPDR does not negatively impact resuscitation outcomes and in fact improves the psychological status, satisfaction, and coping mechanism of the attending family members (2,9).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives on Family Presence During Resuscitation in the Emergency Departments of the Kingdom of Bahrain

Abuzeyad

¹

,

Elhobi

²

,

Kamkoum

³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Worldwide, policies exist on family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), however, this is still lacking in the Gulf Corporation Countries (GCC) in general and in the Kingdom of Bahrain in particular. The aim of this study is to assess the perspectives of healthcare providers (HP) on FPDR among those working in the emergency departments (EDs) in the Kingdom. Methods: A self-administered anonymous electronic survey was collected from 146 HPs (emergency physicians and nurses) working in the three major EDs in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Besides demographic data, 18 items measuring HPs’ perceptions of FPDR were generated using the 5-point Likert scale.Results: Surveys (n= 146) from physicians and nurses were analysed (45.9% vs. 54.1%, respectively). There were significant differences between physicians and nurses in terms of personal beliefs, FPDR enhancing professional satisfaction and behaviour, and the importance of a support person and saying goodbye (p< 0.001). However, general responses demonstrated that the majority of HPs encouraged and supported FPDR, but with greater support from physicians than nurses. Conclusion: The study reflects that many HPs in EDs participated in and are familiar with FPDR, with the majority of ED physicians supporting it. Further studies should investigate the reasons for the lack of support from nurses. Results may contribute to the development of hospital ED policies that allow FPDR in the region.

show abstract

“…The presence of previous experiences with FPDR, physician seniority, speci c policies supporting FPDR, and a dedicated resuscitation member in uences the favorability of FPDR among HPs (2).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order for FPDR to be considered safe and accepted, this needs speci c policies, educated and trained resuscitation members, the selection of a suitable family member during resuscitation, and consideration of the social and religious aspects of the existing culture (2).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives on Family Presence During Resuscitation in the Emergency Departments of the Kingdom of Bahrain

Abuzeyad

¹

,

Elhobi

²

,

Kamkoum

³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Worldwide, policies exist on family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), however, this is still lacking in the Gulf Corporation Countries (GCC) in general and in the Kingdom of Bahrain in particular. The aim of this study is to assess the perspectives of healthcare providers (HP) on FPDR among those working in the emergency departments (EDs) in the Kingdom. Methods: A self-administered anonymous electronic survey was collected from 146 HPs (emergency physicians and nurses) working in the three major EDs in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Besides demographic data, 18 items measuring HPs’ perceptions of FPDR were generated using the 5-point Likert scale.Results: Surveys (n= 146) from physicians and nurses were analysed (45.9% vs. 54.1%, respectively). There were significant differences between physicians and nurses in terms of personal beliefs, FPDR enhancing professional satisfaction and behaviour, and the importance of a support person and saying goodbye (p< 0.001). However, general responses demonstrated that the majority of HPs encouraged and supported FPDR, but with greater support from physicians than nurses. Conclusion: The study reflects that many HPs in EDs participated in and are familiar with FPDR, with the majority of ED physicians supporting it. Further studies should investigate the reasons for the lack of support from nurses. Results may contribute to the development of hospital ED policies that allow FPDR in the region.

show abstract