2005
DOI: 10.1108/03068290510596989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family size, economics and child gender preference: a case study in the Nyeri district of Kenya

Abstract: Kenyan women have more children, especially in rural areas, than in most developing nations. This is widely believed to be an impediment to Kenya's economic development.Thus, factors influencing family size in the Kenyan context are important for its future. A brief review of economic theories of fertility leads to the conclusion that both economics and social/cultural factors must be considered simultaneously when examining factors that determine the number of children in a family. The need to do this is born… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They argue that, there is evidence confirming that son preference is prevalent among Hispanic women in the United States. Similar results are found in Kiriti and Tisdell (2005) who find that the strong son preference in Kenya is due to husband expecting to have male children in order to ensure the survival the family name. Consequently, a possible explanation of large families among these populations is that, couples keep on childbearing until they have a son.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They argue that, there is evidence confirming that son preference is prevalent among Hispanic women in the United States. Similar results are found in Kiriti and Tisdell (2005) who find that the strong son preference in Kenya is due to husband expecting to have male children in order to ensure the survival the family name. Consequently, a possible explanation of large families among these populations is that, couples keep on childbearing until they have a son.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There is an extensive literature on desired family size which gives us some ideas for understanding of the existence of unintended children (Leibenstein (1957);Becker (1960Becker ( , 1981; Becker and Lewis (1973);Schultz (1973) Haskell (1977; Unger and Molina (1999) and Kiriti and Tisdell (2005), among others). Becker (1960) and Becker and Lewis (1973) affirm that since people from low socioeconomic backgrounds do not have wide knowledge of birth control mechanisms, they tend to have more unintended children.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, parents tend to seek healthcare earlier for male than for female children, 31 probably due to male child preference. 32 The proportion of children admitted due to suspected ADRs (0.6%) was half the proportion who developed ADRs while on admission (1.2%). This disparity may be as a result of the exclusion of mild ADRs from the admissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I therefore suggest that when it comes to opportunity, the role of social capital must be considered when examining the growth aspirations of entrepreneurs in developing countries. Moreover, since female entrepreneurs are often the ones most restricted by African cultural norms and expectations (Kiriti & Tisdell, 2005), it is critical to recognize that the impact of social capital may be very different for men than for women (Mungai & Ogot, 2012). Further considerations with regards to gender disparities in entrepreneurship and growth aspirations are discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Social Capital Network and Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their entrepreneurial development is impeded by a wide range of constraints including the legal and regulatory systems and limited access to key resources, such as finance and land (Kiraka et al, 2013). They often face unfavourable opportunities and incentives when it comes to doing business, and must deal with culturally sanctioned biases that limit their participation in entrepreneurial activities (Kiriti & Tisdell, 2005;Mungai & Ogot, 2012). Moreover, women are more involved in the care economy, with greater household and childrearing responsibilities.…”
Section: Gender Entrepreneurship and Growth Aspirationsmentioning
confidence: 99%