2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family structure, education and women’s employment in rural India

Abstract: This study has been prepared within the UNU-WIDER Visiting Scholar programme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
37
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, Afridi et al () estimate women's labour market participation to be approximately 33 per cent in 2011 using the NSS data. As suggested by Desai () and Dhanaraj and Mahambare (), this difference most likely has to do with how participation in labour market of women has been captured in the two surveys. Specifically, Desai () note:…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Specifically, Afridi et al () estimate women's labour market participation to be approximately 33 per cent in 2011 using the NSS data. As suggested by Desai () and Dhanaraj and Mahambare (), this difference most likely has to do with how participation in labour market of women has been captured in the two surveys. Specifically, Desai () note:…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“… Our use of co‐residence with the MIL as a proxy for a woman's access to her network is motivated by Posadas and Vidal‐Fernandez (2013), Debnath (2015), and Dhanaraj and Mahambare (2019) who employ a range of family structure‐based instruments (e.g., death of the woman's father‐in‐law, co‐residence with the father‐in‐law, co‐residence with other matriarchal figures [grandmothers], and joint family residence) as proxies for women's access, mobility, potential for employment outside the home, and empowerment. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we can conclude that there is a link between the family structure and the education level but conferring to Cramer's V it's only a weak association. This outcome is quite surprising since we expected stronger impact of educational which was conducted important (in both, positive and negative ways) in several studies aimed at lifestyle (Rindermann and Ceci, 2018;Dhanaraj and Mahambare, 2019). We believe, that reason can be connected with the fact, that woman's educational level usually don't affect their decisions about design of their family relations and therefore structure of members in their household and vice versa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%