2006
DOI: 10.5414/cnp65427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fanconi’s syndrome and distal (Type 1) renal tubular acidosis in a patient with primary Sjögren’s syndrome with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Distal tubular dysfunction including distal renal tubular acidosis and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus can rarely occur with the proximal tubular dysfunction. [78][79][80] The mechanism for this is not well understood, and other disease processes may be involved. 78 The most common pattern seen on kidney biopsy is patchy tubular injury.…”
Section: Light-chain Fanconi Syndromementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Distal tubular dysfunction including distal renal tubular acidosis and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus can rarely occur with the proximal tubular dysfunction. [78][79][80] The mechanism for this is not well understood, and other disease processes may be involved. 78 The most common pattern seen on kidney biopsy is patchy tubular injury.…”
Section: Light-chain Fanconi Syndromementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) remains the most common presentation of renal involvement in pSS and CD4/CD8 T cell subsets are reported to predominate (27,30). This is often characterized by a distal (type I) renal tubular acidosis (RTA) and less commonly proximal (type II) RTA (Fanconi syndrome) (11,(31)(32)(33). GN is thought to be a rare occurrence, with only case reports available in the literature (10,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), and tends to be a late development (34) in the course of the disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as described above, the patient's urine was negative for BJP and no cryoglobulinemia was detected. On the other hand, there are a few reports showing monoclonal gammopathyassociated renal impairment without paraprotein deposition in either the glomeruli or tubules (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). In a case series of nine patients, Ramos et al concluded that the presence of paraproteins may lead to secondary renal impairment, and they reported four patients who exhibited a worsening of the renal function and required dialysis during a mean follow-up period of 2.4±4.3 years (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%