2014
DOI: 10.3983/twc.2014.0593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fandom and/as labor

Abstract: Editorial providing an overview of the topic of fan studies and labor; and outlining the special issue's contents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the Internet, users spontaneously produce affect and culture with unqualified intrinsic passion and enjoyment, while the users' production is exploited by Internet platforms (Terranova, 2000). Fans' pleasure and the industry's exploitation happen simultaneously in fan labor (Stanfill & Condis, 2014). Milner (2009) argues that fans work for the contents instead of the company.…”
Section: K-pop Fans: Consumption and Prosumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the Internet, users spontaneously produce affect and culture with unqualified intrinsic passion and enjoyment, while the users' production is exploited by Internet platforms (Terranova, 2000). Fans' pleasure and the industry's exploitation happen simultaneously in fan labor (Stanfill & Condis, 2014). Milner (2009) argues that fans work for the contents instead of the company.…”
Section: K-pop Fans: Consumption and Prosumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in other fields of digital culture (e.g., Terranova, 2000), critical arguments reflect on the "exploitation" (a difficult horse to catch, of course, with its semantics of forced action) of fans' "free labor " (e.g., De Kosnik, 2012;Stanfill & Condis, 2014) ranging from inspiration for professional cultural industries to analysis of user content and user profiles (e.g., for enhanced definition of target groups and marketing strategies) to the revenues that archive sites are able to achieve through advertising or paid accounts. Therefore, some scholars who have foreseen attempts to monetize fanfiction (e.g., Scott, 2009) posed (self-)critical questions regarding the participation of fans in profits, and on fannish control and power of influencing emerging business models.…”
Section: Discourse and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copyright regulation, originally aimed to protect printing-shops from illegal printers (Lessig, 2004; Rose, 1993), represents a complex array of struggles over content. However, with the rise of a new participatory culture, the ‘bardic role’ (Hartley, 2009) went global, often free from market constraints: setting an outlaw territory of free-labour and open concurrency that confronts the rights-free, volunteer-driven fandom work with the lowered wedge professional creative sector resulting in an increase in its precarity (Banks and Deuze, 2009; Gill and Pratt, 2008; Stanfill and Condis, 2014). Ordinary users became public performers, producers of cultural tales and bearers of aesthetic values.…”
Section: Regulating the Bardsmentioning
confidence: 99%