Far from Where?

Weissberg, Liliane

doi:10.2307/j.ctv6jm9k2.19

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore in 1980s the emphasize of forest management shifted from top-down policy to decentralization forest management through bottom up policy (Nath et.al, 2016) because the stakeholders (the government, local government, non-government organization, and community) need to consolidate and discuss about more participatory forest management system (Mohammed et.al, 2017;Nath et.al, 2016). To consolidate dofferent stakeholders has same notion with "to collaborate" to reach agreement and gain benefit in socio-economic aspects (Weissberg et.al, 2018).…”

Section: Collaborative Approach: Community Based Forest Management To...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The collaboration becomes an essential aspect in forest management because it improves relationship. One example of this improvement can be seen from the relationship between United State Forest Service (USFS), Hergenfeinstein Quincy Library Group (HQLG), and their stakeholder to restoration 400.000 acres forest in Shasta County (Weissberg et.al, 2018). Furthermore, Weissberg et.al (2018) said inviting stakeholder and citizens into decision-making processes in forest management will increase accountability, effective activities, then positive outcomes.…”

Section: The Essence Of Collaboration Which Observed By Participation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One example of this improvement can be seen from the relationship between United State Forest Service (USFS), Hergenfeinstein Quincy Library Group (HQLG), and their stakeholder to restoration 400.000 acres forest in Shasta County (Weissberg et.al, 2018). Furthermore, Weissberg et.al (2018) said inviting stakeholder and citizens into decision-making processes in forest management will increase accountability, effective activities, then positive outcomes. In addition transaction cost between stakholder can be reduced if the stakeholders strengthen their social network that include of social relationship among of them through effective communication and collaboration (Massiri et.al, 2020).…”

Section: The Essence Of Collaboration Which Observed By Participation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of activities of participation such facilitation from external stakeholder to community can be given by government, researcher, policymaker, or others actor who could improve or complement community capability (Qurniati, Complementing the Access Theory by Collaborative Approach in Indonesia's Social Forestry Context et.al, 2019). Moreover participation is an important aspect because from this activity stakeholder can transfer skill or cabability, knowledge, understanding, even mutual beneficial such money (Pujo et.al, 2018;Weissberg et.al, 2018). Furthermore, the inclusion especially in equity or fairness become an important aspect which effects on participation from facilitation, job distribution, revenue, until to others form of benefit (Humphries, 2020;Qurniati et.al, 2019;Santika et.al, 2019;Essougong et.al, 2019;Mohammed et.al, 2017;Nath et.al, 2016;Fujiwara et.al, 2012).…”

Section: The Essence Of Collaboration Which Observed By Participation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Complementing The Access Theory by Collaborative Approach in Indonesia Social Forestry Context

Rachmawan¹,

Seda²,

Siburian³

2021

JMB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many previous studies examine social forestry in Indonesia from 2016-2020 which describing the factors relate to the implementation. Beyond the previous studies, this paper clustering and mapping the factors through access theory and further complement access theory by a collaborative approach in the social forestry implementation context. Qualitative desk research is used to examine 39 papers with Nvivo 12. The result shows there are two elements of the four elements of structure-relational access mechanism (SRAM) that have positive effects on social forestry implementation, while three elements of the five elements of the SRAM element give a negative effect. In turn, there are various unclustered factors which not a part of SRAM that affects social forestry implementation both positive or negative. These unclustered factors are the blank spaces of access theory which complemented by a collaborative approach, there are “participation” and “equity” which supported by “effective communication”. With a collaborative approach, the scope becomes wider that not only analyze in individual scope, but also in organizational scope, and the benefit can be seen by outside stakeholder through community contribution in social forestry implementation.

show abstract

Section: Collaborative Approach: Community Based Forest Management To...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Essence Of Collaboration Which Observed By Participation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Essence Of Collaboration Which Observed By Participation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Essence Of Collaboration Which Observed By Participation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Complementing The Access Theory by Collaborative Approach in Indonesia Social Forestry Context

Rachmawan¹,

Seda²,

Siburian³

2021

JMB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Far from Where?

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Complementing The Access Theory by Collaborative Approach in Indonesia Social Forestry Context

Complementing The Access Theory by Collaborative Approach in Indonesia Social Forestry Context

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About