2003
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2003.815399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faraday rotation effects on l-band spaceborne sar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
116
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, FR depends on the total electron content and the magnetic field along the path and may be estimated from [5] and [7] as…”
Section: B Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, FR depends on the total electron content and the magnetic field along the path and may be estimated from [5] and [7] as…”
Section: B Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the parallel magnetic field was obtained at a height of 300 km from the IGRF10 model presented in Section II-A. As the strength of geomagnetic field varies slowly at ionospheric heights, a reference mean value is commonly estimated for a set reference height between 300 and 450 km [7].…”
Section: B Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though these methods were originally developed for airborne systems, they are also applicable to satellite systems, but encounter problems at long wavelengths because of complications arising from Faraday rotation (FR). This may not be a serious issue even for frequencies as low as L-band, such as the ALOS-PALSAR system [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], but at P-band it becomes a serious issue [22][23][24][25][26]. Fortunately, spaceborne SAR systems are much more stable than airborne systems, and scene-by-scene updates of the system errors are unlikely to be required [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corner reflectors (CR) were deployed during the acquisitions for calibration purposes. Faraday rotation is generally low at the Amazonian forests [11], [12]. As a result, conventional Cband calibration methods that are mainly based on the VanZyl algorithm [8] can be used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%