2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2019.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farfantepenaeus subtilis (Pérez-Farfante, 1967) and F. brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817) (Decapoda, Penaeidae): Ontogenetic comparison using the combined analysis of secondary sexual characters and molecular markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for the COI gene are in between the intraspecific and interspecific thresholds of Decapoda. Even though intraspecific distances of up to 2.7% were reported for the penaeid shrimp Artemesia longinaris Spence Bate, 1888, it was less than 1% in other Atlantic Dendrobranchiata shrimps, such as Pleoticus muelleri (Spence Bate, 1888), Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Pérez-Farfante, 1967), Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817), and Farfantepenaeus subtilis (Pérez-Farfante, 1967) 22,3538 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for the COI gene are in between the intraspecific and interspecific thresholds of Decapoda. Even though intraspecific distances of up to 2.7% were reported for the penaeid shrimp Artemesia longinaris Spence Bate, 1888, it was less than 1% in other Atlantic Dendrobranchiata shrimps, such as Pleoticus muelleri (Spence Bate, 1888), Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Pérez-Farfante, 1967), Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817), and Farfantepenaeus subtilis (Pérez-Farfante, 1967) 22,3538 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correct taxonomic identification of important fishery resources is essential to enhance biodiversity knowledge and to develop adequate management and conservation strategies 20–22 . Recently, the combination of molecular tools and the detailed morphological analyses of the reproductive structures has proved to be very effective to solve taxonomic problems and to differentiate and describe cryptic species of decapod crustaceans 23,24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accurate and rapid identification is essential to enhance knowledge of their ecology and provide the information needed for appropriate conservation planning 15 , 16 . Identification at the species level using morphological characteristics for certain animal groups, especially amphibians with cryptic species, can be challenging 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular tools were used to elucidate the taxonomic status of several marine shrimp species, whose morphology is insufficient to clarify their species identity ( Carvalho, Magalhães & Mantelatto, 2014 ; Tavares & Gusmão, 2016 ; Carvalho, Magalhães & Mantelatto, 2020 ). Combined with morphological data, genetic data allowed the interpretation of variability patterns along the distribution of some taxa ( Silva, Mesquita & Paula, 2010 ; Terossi & Mantelatto, 2012 ; Rossi & Mantelatto, 2013 ; Teodoro et al, 2016 ; Carvalho-Batista et al, 2019 ; França et al, 2019 ; Terossi & Mantelatto, 2020 ; França et al, 2021 ). The mitochondrial genes cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and 16S rRNA have been considered powerful markers for molecular analysis in several studies of decapod shrimp at species and population levels ( Gusmão, Lazoski & Solé-Cava, 2000 ; Maggioni et al, 2001 ; Lavery et al, 2004 ; Vergamini, Pileggi & Mantelatto, 2011 ; Terossi & Mantelatto, 2012 ; Teodoro et al, 2016 ; Carvalho-Batista et al, 2018 ; França et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%