2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01727-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm Income Insurance as an Alternative for Traditional Crop Insurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Revenue (or income) insurance may be offered in a form of individual instruments but in this case, an important problem remains moral hazard and a need to record revenues/ income or as index-based insurance (Janowicz-Lomott et al, 2015). In economic practice, the most complex form of "revenue-income" insurance in agriculture can be gross margin insurance, which, in addition to protecting revenues, also provides the protection against changes in certain production costs.…”
Section: Revenue and Margin Insurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revenue (or income) insurance may be offered in a form of individual instruments but in this case, an important problem remains moral hazard and a need to record revenues/ income or as index-based insurance (Janowicz-Lomott et al, 2015). In economic practice, the most complex form of "revenue-income" insurance in agriculture can be gross margin insurance, which, in addition to protecting revenues, also provides the protection against changes in certain production costs.…”
Section: Revenue and Margin Insurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walters and Preston [12] described the value of insurance for producers and the importance of using a combination of public and private risk management tools. In view of the latest trends in agricultural and economic policies, other authors point out that there is a degree of pressure to increase the volume of market methods and individual co-participation in the costs associated with lessening income risks in agriculture [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%