1966
DOI: 10.2307/1236215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm Land Prices and Farm Technological Advance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Partly, this may reflect the fact that findings regarding distributional impacts are comparatively sensitive to aspects of specification that often must be chosen arbitrarily; thus the results are fragile. An example is Cochrane's technology treadmill argument suggesting that, among farmers, only the early adopters of new technology benefit, and even they do so only temporarily (Cochrane 1958, Herdt & Cochrane 1966. As shown in this review, specific conditions must hold for this argument to be true (it requires a relatively inelastic demand and a multiplicative supply shift), and they probably do not hold in most applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Partly, this may reflect the fact that findings regarding distributional impacts are comparatively sensitive to aspects of specification that often must be chosen arbitrarily; thus the results are fragile. An example is Cochrane's technology treadmill argument suggesting that, among farmers, only the early adopters of new technology benefit, and even they do so only temporarily (Cochrane 1958, Herdt & Cochrane 1966. As shown in this review, specific conditions must hold for this argument to be true (it requires a relatively inelastic demand and a multiplicative supply shift), and they probably do not hold in most applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The capitalization of government programs into land prices has also been discussed in the literature [12][13][14][15][16]. Tweeten et al [14] concluded that pressures to increase farm size and the capitalized benefits of farm programs could explain 52% of the variation in land prices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supply concept that Herdt and Cochrane (1966) use to analyse land prices is an aggregate supply function illustrating the amount of farm land which is offered for sale at different prices. They suggest that the idea that the total area of land is fixed does not give any information on the aggregate supply of land, since a supply function relates price to the quantity of land offered for sale and not to the total quantity of land.…”
Section: The Supply Function Of Farm Landmentioning
confidence: 99%