2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11698-016-0157-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm mechanization on an otherwise ‘featureless’ plain: tractors on the Northern Great Plains and immigration policy of the 1920s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…60 In places where it could not, immigration is associated with markers of a shift towards more laborintensive production techniques (from tractors to mules). The latter is consistent with evidence from the natural experiment of the U.S. shutting down immigration in the 1920s (Lew and Cater 2010). 61 Lafortune et al (2014) examine the impact of changes in skill ratios (share literate), induced by immigration, on the manufacturing sector between 1860 and 1940, using data tabulated from the Census of Manufactures to the county or city x industry level.…”
Section: Summarizing the Productivity Impactsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…60 In places where it could not, immigration is associated with markers of a shift towards more laborintensive production techniques (from tractors to mules). The latter is consistent with evidence from the natural experiment of the U.S. shutting down immigration in the 1920s (Lew and Cater 2010). 61 Lafortune et al (2014) examine the impact of changes in skill ratios (share literate), induced by immigration, on the manufacturing sector between 1860 and 1940, using data tabulated from the Census of Manufactures to the county or city x industry level.…”
Section: Summarizing the Productivity Impactsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…60 The industry mix result contrasts with modern findings that industry mix adjustments plays a trivial role in the absorption of immigration-driven skill mix changes (e.g., Lewis 2003;Card and Lewis 2007; Gonzales and Ortega 2011; Dustmann and Glitz forthcoming). 61 Lew and Cater (2010) examine agricultural counties on opposite either side of the Canada-U.S. border during the 1920s, when the U.S. shut down inflows of foreign workers. This is associated with a sharp uptick in labor-saving tractor use on the U.S. side of the border relative to the Canadian side, on what should be very similar agricultural land.…”
Section: Summarizing the Productivity Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few studies that empirically investigate the effect of a change in the supply, or price, of an input on technological innovation and adoption (Popp, 2002;Acemoglu & Finkelstein, 2008;Lewis, 2011;Hanlon, 2015;Lafortune & González-Velosa., 2015;Aghion et al, 2016;Lew & Cater, 2018). In particular, some empirical studies link emigration to technological change in origin locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper contributes to a growing consensus that a loss of immigrant labor may not generate employment opportunities for native-born workers, as immigrants can be readily replaced with mechanization or automation in some industries. LaFortune, Tessada and González-Velosa (2015) and Lew and Cater (2018) show that the slowing of immigration in the early twentieth century hastened mechanization on American farms. Similarly, Hornbeck and Naidu (2014) find that southern planters responded to black out-migration by investing in farm capital, and Clemens, Lewis and Postel (2018) document the same following restrictions against Bracero farm workers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%