2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm production efficiency and natural forest extraction: Evidence from Cambodia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
27
3
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
27
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Chandio et al (2017) stated that credit, land area, fertilizer, and labor significantly affect rice productivity in Sindh, Pakistan. The sex of the head of the household is also considered to influence the efficiency of agricultural production (Nguyen et al, 2018). Nguyen et al (2018) also state variables of age, education, number of family members, and workforce from their own families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chandio et al (2017) stated that credit, land area, fertilizer, and labor significantly affect rice productivity in Sindh, Pakistan. The sex of the head of the household is also considered to influence the efficiency of agricultural production (Nguyen et al, 2018). Nguyen et al (2018) also state variables of age, education, number of family members, and workforce from their own families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sex of the head of the household is also considered to influence the efficiency of agricultural production (Nguyen et al, 2018). Nguyen et al (2018) also state variables of age, education, number of family members, and workforce from their own families. Mishra et al (2018) examined the efficiency of female farmers in managing the agricultural sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have emphasized the issue of land use efficiency from different perspectives, including the efficiency of construction land and farmland productivity. Associations between land use and urbanization efficiency have also been analyzed (Huang et al, 2016;Nguyen et al, 2017;Deilmann et al, 2018) at all spatial scales (e.g., national and provincial as well as at the level of urban agglomerations, watersheds and individual cities) Rashidi et al, 2015). Previous research has also highlighted the mechanisms underlying changes in urbanization efficiency by analyzing drivers and spillover effects at different spatial scales ; thus, both parametric and non-parametric methods have been utilized in this area (Battese et al, 1995;Jin et al, 2017), corresponding with the classic data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) models, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over‐extraction of forest and water resources brings serious consequences in terms of degradation of natural resources and deterioration of rural livelihoods. Even though extraction activities by rural households can destroy less the resources than by logging or fishing firms, they can still degrade the resources (Nguyen, Do, Parvathi, Wossink, & Grote, ). Therefore, a deep understanding of the roles of the resources to rural livelihoods, the factors affecting the extraction and dependence, and the impacts on rural welfare is relevant for successful rural development and conservation initiatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%