2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-009-9170-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farm soil carbon monitoring developments and land use change: unearthing relationships between paddock carbon stocks, monitoring technology and new market options in Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study's landscape, limited rainfall and very hot and dry summers are likely to be limiting factors for grassland growth, as simulated by the APSIM-Agpasture module. Nonetheless, in terms of percent gain in SOC through conversion of degraded lands to natural grasslands, our results show agreement with previously reported limits of 15–20% increases [ 56 , 57 , 59 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study's landscape, limited rainfall and very hot and dry summers are likely to be limiting factors for grassland growth, as simulated by the APSIM-Agpasture module. Nonetheless, in terms of percent gain in SOC through conversion of degraded lands to natural grasslands, our results show agreement with previously reported limits of 15–20% increases [ 56 , 57 , 59 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Adding the GRA country names (56 as of October 2018) to the initial search reduced this to 14 papers. These studies cover parts of a country (McHenry, ; Nerger, Funk, Cordsen, & Fohrer, ; Steinmann et al, ; Wilson, Barnes, Koen, Ghosh, & King, ), consider selected agro‐ecosystems or agricultural practices (Allen, Pringle, Page, & Dalal, ; de Gruijter et al, ; McHenry, ; Scott et al, ; Wu, Clarke, & Mulder, ), outline the basis for a possible national soil monitoring system (Spencer, Ogle, Breidt, Goebel, & Paustian, ; Visschers, Finke, & Gruijter, ), were discontinued due to lack of funding (Goidts, Wesemael, & Oost, ; Taghizadeh‐Toosi, Olesen, et al, ; Yagasaki & Shirato, ) or, alternatively, concern measurement systems that are in their first (Mäkipää, Liski, Guendehou, Malimbwi, & Kaaya, ; Nijbroek et al, ) or second round (Orgiazzi, Ballabio, Panagos, Jones, & Fernández‐Ugalde, ; Spencer et al, ).…”
Section: What Mrv Platforms Are Currently In Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges to the measurement of SOM include: spatial variability (Conant et al, 2011), which implies a need for intense spatial measuring density; the influence of many different factors such as land use and soil type (Martin et al, 2011;Van Wesemael et al, 2011), which can be resolved with a stratified sampling approach; measuring changes in SOM content over time (Chapman et al, 2013); and the need to obtain measurements rapidly and cheaply in order to make the monitoring cost-effective. This last challenge has received a great deal of attention in recent years (see McHenry, 2009) and has seen some breakthroughs in the use of monitoring soil spectral properties with remote sensing, for example (Croft et al, 2012), or field spectroscopy techniques (Stevens et al, 2008;Bellon-Maurel & McBratney, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%