2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-70942002000300004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmacodinâmica do cisatracúrio no transplante renal

Abstract: Onset, clinical duration and recovery time were comparable between groups. Time to T4/T1 > 0.7 and > 0.9 was longer in the renal failure group as compared to the normal group and cisatracurium did not show cumulative effects in the renal failure group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our case is the first report of cisatracurium pharmacodynamics under the administration of sevoflurane in patients with PCD. As shown in Table 1, when sevoflurane was constantly administered, the clinical duration, and recovery index of cisatracurium in our case were comparable to the mean values in the normal population, elderly individuals, infants, children and those with chronic renal failure [16–19] . However, at recovery times of TOFRs of 0.7 and 0.9, our data presented a longer recovery profile of cisatracurium.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our case is the first report of cisatracurium pharmacodynamics under the administration of sevoflurane in patients with PCD. As shown in Table 1, when sevoflurane was constantly administered, the clinical duration, and recovery index of cisatracurium in our case were comparable to the mean values in the normal population, elderly individuals, infants, children and those with chronic renal failure [16–19] . However, at recovery times of TOFRs of 0.7 and 0.9, our data presented a longer recovery profile of cisatracurium.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As shown in Table 1, when sevoflurane was constantly administered, the clinical duration, and recovery index of cisatracurium in our case were comparable to the mean values in the normal population, elderly individuals, infants, children and those with chronic renal failure. [16][17][18][19] However, at recovery times of TOFRs of 0.7 and 0.9, our data presented a longer recovery profile of cisatracurium. A possible explanation for the discrepancy is that different concentrations of sevoflurane were used across studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation