2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01302-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmer Livelihood Strategies and Attitudes in Response to Climate Change in Agroforestry Systems in Kedougou, Senegal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing research on sustainable livelihoods mainly refers to the spatial differentiation of livelihoods [10], the interaction between livelihood activities and ecological environment [11,12], the impact of climate change on livelihoods [13,14], the relationship between "land use evolution" and livelihood output [15,16], the impact of ecological compensation on farmers' livelihood [17,18], and the impact of rural tourism on farmers' livelihoods [19], as well as livelihood vulnerability assessment [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing research on sustainable livelihoods mainly refers to the spatial differentiation of livelihoods [10], the interaction between livelihood activities and ecological environment [11,12], the impact of climate change on livelihoods [13,14], the relationship between "land use evolution" and livelihood output [15,16], the impact of ecological compensation on farmers' livelihood [17,18], and the impact of rural tourism on farmers' livelihoods [19], as well as livelihood vulnerability assessment [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers face financial risks such as price fluctuations of agricultural products [71], financing difficulties [72], shortage of funds [73], and lack of market information, and poor farmers are greatly affected. For example, Li et al [74] found that the price fluctuation of agricultural products will make the per capita net income of poor farmers change more than that of non-poor farmers; Gao and Yan [75] found that poor farmers have a small production scale and weak ability to avoid risks; Feder and Nishio [76] found that poor farmers' credit and funds are not as good as other farmers, which will make it difficult for poor farmers to obtain loans from financial institutions; Jiao et al [77] found that poor farmers have less farmland available for mortgage, so less financing is available; Papa [32] found that the financial capital owned by farmers will affect their ability to cope with livelihood risks, and farmers with good economic conditions are more capable of coping with financial risks. However, some scholars pointed out that poor farmers have limited livelihood capital, so they are less impacted by financial risks.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Addison and Brown [31] used the sustainable livelihood method and found that the poorer a family, the more united its livelihood capital structure, and the weaker its ability to cope with livelihood risks. Papa [32] believed that the financial and physical capital owned by farmers will affect their ability to cope with livelihood risk portfolio capital and play an important role in coping with livelihood risks. Scoones [33] believed that under the attack of multiple internal and external risks, farmers' pensions are extremely vulnerable, which may cause the elderly in rural areas to fall into the situation of no financial source, no one to take care of their life and lack of end-of-life escorts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region has distinct wet (June-September) and dry (October-May) seasons; peak rainfall is usually in August (roughly 300 mm). Agroforestry is a common practice in the region; in addition to farming staple grains, individual households often cultivate gardens, a variety of fruit trees, and live fences (Papa et al, 2020). Staple grains include fonio, corn, millet, sorghum, and rice (Wood, 2018).…”
Section: Study Site and Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%