2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-013-9579-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmer Seed Exchange and Crop Diversity in a Changing Agricultural Landscape in the Southern Highlands of Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Requesting seeds on a regular basis from the same individual is morally reproved and shameful (shame: so̰ orȅ in Tupuri), and as such is avoided as much as possible. Similar observations have been made in other African contexts (Labeyrie 2013, Samberg et al 2013. A deviation from such cultural norms is only tolerated within these relations of geographical and social proximity.…”
Section: Cereal Substitution and Resilience Of The Networksupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Requesting seeds on a regular basis from the same individual is morally reproved and shameful (shame: so̰ orȅ in Tupuri), and as such is avoided as much as possible. Similar observations have been made in other African contexts (Labeyrie 2013, Samberg et al 2013. A deviation from such cultural norms is only tolerated within these relations of geographical and social proximity.…”
Section: Cereal Substitution and Resilience Of The Networksupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Because of the moral rule according to which "begging" seeds from the same partners in two consecutive years is socially penalized (Samberg et al 2013), analyzing seed acquisition networks in two "normal" years would probably have revealed the same absence of stable and repeated partnerships. However, studying the patterns of seed acquisitions through successive cropping seasons characterized by different environmental constraints is instructive, providing information on how farmers may differentially mobilize their social network to adapt their farming strategies to unpredictable climatic variations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different scales of private enterprise serve different purposes, informal systems distribute planting material to smallholders and larger multipliers and commercial companies to larger farmers; only together can they claim to 'Work everywhere and for everyone'. The informal sector is often seen as and called a farmer seed system (reviewed: Coomes et al 2015), with farmers producing planting material for their own use and to exchange with or sell to other farmers (Abay et al 2011;Almekinders et al 1994;Samberg et al 2013). Such farmer seed systems (Aw-Hassan et al 2008;Sperling and McGuire 2010;Witcombe et al 2010;Takoutsing et al 2012;Tin et al 2011) and farmer seed businesses (de Boef and Thijssen 2010; Louwaars and de Boef 2012; Neate and Guei 2010) have often been promoted to improve the distribution of planting material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a much finer scale, household-level properties and individual characteristics have also been explored to uncover differential patterns of seed seeking and seed provisioning behaviors within communities. Studies have shown that gender (Zimmerer 2003, Ban and Coomes 2004, Chambers and Brush 2010, Ricciardi 2015, age (Alvarez et al 2005), farmer expertise (Subedi et al 2003, Calvet-Mir et al 2012, Kawa et al 2013, Reyes-García et al 2013, richness of crop diversity (Ban and Coomes 2004, Alvarez et al 2005, Calvet-Mir et al 2012, Reyes-García et al 2013, and household socioeconomic status (Louette et al 1997, Alvarez et al 2005, Nagarajan et al 2007, van Etten and de Bruin 2007, McGuire 2008, Stromberg et al 2010, Rana et al 2011, Samberg et al 2013, Poudel et al 2015 are important factors in understanding the structure of seed circulation networks. Of particular interest for our case study are those dimensions related to household socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a use implies that subsistence practices and strategies are uniform across household members. The assumption is revealed by the general trend of collecting household-level data by interviewing a single household member ("household heads" are often preferred), whose answers are considered representative of the household as a whole (van Etten and de Bruin 2007, Stromberg et al 2010, Abay et al 2011, Kawa et al 2013, Samberg et al 2013, Ricciardi 2015. Research designs in which several household members are interviewed are http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss1/art44/ rare (Alvarez et al 2005, Chambers andBrush 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%