Farmers’ Associations: Their Resources and Channels of Influence. Evidence from Poland

Abstract

This article aims to contribute to the existing studies on the influence of interest groups on agricultural policies. The goal of the article is to assess the tangible and intangible resources of farmers' associations in Poland, as well as the channels they use to influence agricultural policy. With this aim, an interdisciplinary model based on exchange theory was elaborated. The article draws on two empirical sources: first, in-depth interviews with leaders; and secondly, a survey with members of these organisations. According to the leaders, farmers' associations may influence agricultural policy only to a small degree. This results from their insufficient resources, especially those that are useful for politicians (e.g., expert knowledge). The second obstacle stems from the lack of unity and cooperation between these associations. However, members of farmers' organisations paint a very different picture of farmers' organisations: regardless of the type of organisation they belong to, they perceive it as very active and well-endowed with tangible and intangible resources.

Options for agricultural service cooperatives in a postsocialist economy: Evidence from Romania

“…This process began in Romania in May 1949 and, after much resistance from the farmers, was finalized in March 1962 ( Iordachi and Dobrincu, 2014 ). It is argued that the destructive impact of the totalitarian communist legacy persists in all postsocialist economies today ( Gijselinckx and Bussels, 2014 ; Milczarek-Andrzejewska and Śpiewak, 2018 ), since the collective farms established by coercive means were often labeled as agricultural cooperatives. This experience led to a high degree of distrust among farmers with regard to any type of collective action.…”

A Review of Rural Land Capitalization: Current Status and Further Research

“…Utilizing the decoupling model, the degree of capitalization is predominantly measured based on the scarcity/surplus of rights relative to eligible hectares, implementation mode, and elasticity of land supply [8]. A computable general equilibrium model discerns the role of policy in land use conflicts, considering not only funding scale but also social and economic conditions, agricultural structure, and urbanization levels in areas with conflicting interests [9]. Under the hypothesis of urban geography theory, rural areas around developed areas rarely prosper.…”