2019
DOI: 10.3390/socsci8020063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Farmers’ Bargaining Power and Input Prices: What Can We Learn from Self-Reported Assessments?1

Abstract: One of the key challenges in improving our understanding of farmers’ relations with input suppliers is that we do not have direct information about farmers’ bargaining power vis-à-vis their input providers. To overcome this problem, this study used farmers’ self-reported assessments of their position in the supply chain. Using unique micro-survey data from the dairy sector in Poland, we constructed a proxy of farmers’ bargaining power and showed that it helps to explain discounts at which farmers buy feed from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core of entrepreneurship is taking responsibility for and making decisions that affect the location, form, and use of the goods and resources of a business [56]. These decisions result among others in the bargaining position of farmers versus their contractors, which depend not only on the classical factors such as resources, quality attributes, and scales of operation or location, but also on qualitative determinants as relationships, both vertically within the chain, as well horizontally with other farmers [57,58]. The issue of farmers' power in the agri-food chain is widely discussed [59][60][61].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core of entrepreneurship is taking responsibility for and making decisions that affect the location, form, and use of the goods and resources of a business [56]. These decisions result among others in the bargaining position of farmers versus their contractors, which depend not only on the classical factors such as resources, quality attributes, and scales of operation or location, but also on qualitative determinants as relationships, both vertically within the chain, as well horizontally with other farmers [57,58]. The issue of farmers' power in the agri-food chain is widely discussed [59][60][61].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies emphasize the behaviour of intermediaries when they have market power: for instance, Merel et al (2009) argue that high transportation costs can be an important factor that increases the market power of middlemen. Xhoxhi et al (2014), Fałkowski et al (2017, Bonanno et al (2018), andMalak-Rawlikowska et al (2019) also address the question of market power and bargaining in agrifood markets. In the case of Vietnam, Thanh (2017Thanh ( , 2018 constructs an industrial organisation model for developing countries, analysing the market power of middlemen and their behaviour in the traditional food distribution system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the unique results dealing with the vertical linkages of the farmers in the supply chain, and the role of self-reported bargaining power, was presented in research by Malak-Rawlikowska et al 2018;Malak-Rawlikowska and Milczarek-Andrzejewska 2016;Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Malak-Rawlikowska and Fałkowski 2015). Examining the vertical relations in the dairy chain from the point of view of milk producers, the authors noted that the level of integration differed significantly depending on forward or backward relationships.…”
Section: Hold-ups and The Degree Of Vertical Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Polish dairy-sector study (for more see Malak-Rawlikowska and Milczarek-Andrzejewska 2016;Malak-Rawlikowska, Milczarek-Andrzejewska and Fałkowski 2018) showed that the farmers source feed from two main channels: direct purchase from a feed-producing company and purchase from an intermediary in the animal feed sector (e.g. local feed shops).…”
Section: Hold-up Range and Durability Of Relations -An Empirical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%