Farmers’ Perceptions of Tree Shelterbelts on Agricultural Land in Rural Kyrgyzstan

Abstract

The reestablishment of agroforestry systems in Central Asia, combining crop production with protective tree shelterbelts, provides significant potential to improve farming systems. This includes increasing crop yields, additional income from timber, as well as reducing soil degradation and wind erosion. Thus, adopting shelterbelts as a form of pro-environmental behavior provides a number of socio-economic benefits, although some trade-offs need to be considered as well. This paper investigates factors that shape the perception of—and attitude towards—the establishment of tree shelterbelts by farmers in two case study regions in Kyrgyzstan. Applying a conceptual framework distinguishing between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, research methods included semi-structured interviews with farmers and local policy makers. The results show spatial differences in the perception of shelterbelts, both on the regional and on the village scale. In general, shelterbelts were negatively perceived by more than half of the farmers. The main concern raised by farmers was the shading of crops by shelterbelts, resulting in a decrease of yield. In addition, small field sizes and potential conflicts with neighbors were key concerns. Furthermore, rules set by local self-government bodies were inconsistent with the legislative framework, posing significant restrictions to the adoption of sustainable land use practices.

Global Challenges and Responses: Agriculture, Economic Globalization, and Environmental Sustainability in Central Asia

“…Agriculture was chosen as the subject of this study because it is highly vulnerable to climate change and water scarcity [22]. The most important crops in Central Asia are wheat, barley, maize, potatoes, oilseeds, and a range of vegetable crops.…”

Forest landscape restoration: state of play

“…Climate limits increasing forest area but agroforestry, in particular windbreaks near settlements and intensive agriculture could add trees to the landscape [ 15 , 150 ]. Nevertheless, FLR principles promoting stakeholder participation run counter to the remaining vestiges of Soviet-style central planning [ 15 , 151 ].…”

The end of postsocialism (as we knew it): Diverse economies and the East

“…It is also important not to assume that collective or convivial practices are unproblematic from an environmental perspective. For instance, agrochemicals are still used by many Czech gardeners and Kyrgyzstani farmers, although in both cases an interest in natural growing methods can be observed (Ruppert et al, 2020; Sovová et al, 2021). We hope that future scholarship and practice can shed more light on these aspects, while remaining open to the relevance of diverse Eastern economies for postcapitalist imaginaries.…”