2018
DOI: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.1.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fasciocutaneous Propeller Flap Based on Perforating Branch of Ulnar Artery for Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Hand and Wrist

Abstract: BackgroundA skin defect of the hand and wrist is a common manifestation in industrial crushing injuries, traffic accidents or after excision of tumors. We reconstructed a skin defect in the ulnar aspect of the hand and wrist with a perforator-based propeller flap from the ulnar artery. The aims of our study are to evaluate the utility and effectiveness of this flap and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the flap in hand and wrist reconstruction with a review of the literature.MethodsBetween April 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important flaps that can be a replacement for RAPF are certainly the ulnar artery perforator flap and retrograde posterior interosseus artery flap. Nutrition of ulnar artery perforator flap is based on distal septocutaneous perforators of ulnar artery 32 . It is suitable for covering defects on the ulnar side of the wrist and hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important flaps that can be a replacement for RAPF are certainly the ulnar artery perforator flap and retrograde posterior interosseus artery flap. Nutrition of ulnar artery perforator flap is based on distal septocutaneous perforators of ulnar artery 32 . It is suitable for covering defects on the ulnar side of the wrist and hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] To achieve a satisfactory reconstruction, it is essential to consider not only a functional but also an aesthetic outcome, and balancing the recipient area's result with the donor area's morbidity. [10][11][12] In this study, we propose different skin tailored pedicles and free flaps for different hand defects; for a proper understating, we divided them into two groups: small (defects that compromise one digit or part of it) and large (defects affecting the palmar or dorsal region of the hand, as well as when more than one digit is affected) reconstructions (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we assessed patients' satisfaction regarding donor site morbidity and aesthetic outcome of the flap as two separate items as shown in table (3) and we gave the patients 4 choices in the questionnaire, in contrast to Ignatiadis et al (21) and Jang et al (28) who gave their patients three choices only in the questionnaire, also they did not separate donor site from the flap itself during assessment of patients' satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%