2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2019.00039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FashionAI: A Hierarchical Dataset for Fashion Understanding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some evaluation metrics used to assess the performance of clothing retrieval methods. The different evaluation metrics used are as follows: (1) Top-k retrieval accuracy, the ratio of queries with at least one matching item retrieved within the top-k returned results, (2) Precision@k, the ratio of items in the top-k returned results that are matched Fashion Meets Computer Vision: A Survey 72:11 Since dataset for attribute-specific fashion retrieval is lacking, this dataset rebuild three fashion dataset with attribute annotations DARN [69], FashionAI [232], DeepFashion [123] with the queries, (3) Recall@k, the ratio of matching items that are covered in the top-k returned results, (4) Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG) (NDCG@k), the relative orders among matching and non-matching items within the top-k returned results, and ( 5) Mean Average Precision (MAP), which measures the precision of returned results at every position in the ranked sequence of returned results across all queries. Table 2 of the Supplementary Material presents the performance comparisons of some retrieval methods reviewed in this survey.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some evaluation metrics used to assess the performance of clothing retrieval methods. The different evaluation metrics used are as follows: (1) Top-k retrieval accuracy, the ratio of queries with at least one matching item retrieved within the top-k returned results, (2) Precision@k, the ratio of items in the top-k returned results that are matched Fashion Meets Computer Vision: A Survey 72:11 Since dataset for attribute-specific fashion retrieval is lacking, this dataset rebuild three fashion dataset with attribute annotations DARN [69], FashionAI [232], DeepFashion [123] with the queries, (3) Recall@k, the ratio of matching items that are covered in the top-k returned results, (4) Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG) (NDCG@k), the relative orders among matching and non-matching items within the top-k returned results, and ( 5) Mean Average Precision (MAP), which measures the precision of returned results at every position in the ranked sequence of returned results across all queries. Table 2 of the Supplementary Material presents the performance comparisons of some retrieval methods reviewed in this survey.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the forecasted keypoints and the actual values [48]. Only the keypoints included in the input frame (i.e.…”
Section: Normalized Error (Ne) Normalized Error (Ne) Is the Average Normalized Distance Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical simulation working within the fashion domain focus on clothing-body interactions, and datasets can be categorized into real data and created data. Despite the rapid revolution on previous datasets which are based on 2D images like DeepFashion [72], DeepFashion2 [77] and FashionAI [116], the production of datasets basing on 3D clothing is almost rare or not sufficient for training like the digital wardrobe released by MGN [117]. In 2020, Heming et al [118] develop a comprehensive dataset named Deep Fashion3D which is richly annotated and covers a much larger variations of garment styles.…”
Section: Video Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%