2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2008
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast algorithms for L<inf>&#x221E;</inf> problems in multiview geometry

Abstract: Many problems in multi-view geometry, when posed as minimization of the maximum reprojection error across observations, can be solved optimally in polynomial time. We show that these problems are instances of a convex-concave generalized fractional program. We survey the major solution methods for solving problems of this form and present them in a unified framework centered around a single parametric optimization problem. We propose two new algorithms and show that the algorithm proposed by Olsson et al. [21… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the nonlinearity of the camera projection, γ(r) can have multiple local minima when defined in terms of the 2 norm [2,6,9]. In contrast, aggregating the reprojection errors with the ∞ norm always results in a convex set of stationary points because of its pseudo-convex character [1,3,5,12,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the nonlinearity of the camera projection, γ(r) can have multiple local minima when defined in terms of the 2 norm [2,6,9]. In contrast, aggregating the reprojection errors with the ∞ norm always results in a convex set of stationary points because of its pseudo-convex character [1,3,5,12,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quasi-convexity implies that the set of stationary points is convex: no local optima exist. Yet even for many existing ∞ methods, single view reprojection errors are expressed in terms of the 2 norm; we will call them hybrid ∞ methods [1,3,12,17]. We note that the criterion optimized by the hybrid approaches cannot easily be related to the maximum-likelihood estimation of a noise model.…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Triangulation and resectioning are solved with a certificate of optimality using convex relaxation techniques for fractional programs in (Agarwal et al 2006). Several geometric problems in computer vision, when posed in the L ∞ -norm, can be solved to their global optimum using techniques of quasiconvex optimization (Kahl 2005;Sim and Hartley 2006;Agarwal et al 2008). A survey of some of the recent work in developing optimal algorithms for multiview geometry can be found in (Hartley and Kahl 2007).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%