2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cvi.2015.0316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and accurate algorithm for eye localisation for gaze tracking in low‐resolution images

Abstract: Iris centre localization in low-resolution visible images is a challenging problem in computer vision community due to noise, shadows, occlusions, pose variations, eye blinks, etc. This paper proposes an efficient method for determining iris centre in low-resolution images in the visible spectrum. Even low-cost consumer-grade webcams can be used for gaze tracking without any additional hardware. A two-stage algorithm is proposed for iris centre localization. The proposed method uses geometrical characteristics… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, algorithms for remote eye-trackers need to deal with off-axis camera positions or partly visible eyes. From the perspective of our research, three algorithms for remote eye-tracking are of special interest: one proposed by George and Routray, another proposed by Droege and Paulus, and a third by Timm and Barth [3,7,13]. Among these three algorithms, the approach by Timm and Barth achieved the best results, achieving stable detection rates on all three data sets [4].…”
Section: Eye Center Localizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, algorithms for remote eye-trackers need to deal with off-axis camera positions or partly visible eyes. From the perspective of our research, three algorithms for remote eye-tracking are of special interest: one proposed by George and Routray, another proposed by Droege and Paulus, and a third by Timm and Barth [3,7,13]. Among these three algorithms, the approach by Timm and Barth achieved the best results, achieving stable detection rates on all three data sets [4].…”
Section: Eye Center Localizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are many articles describing the approaches to gaze tracking for a robot, but most of them do not provide any working samples that can be evaluated [7,8,17,18]. Some commercial solutions are available, but they are based on commercial eye trackers like Tobii or Pupil Labs.…”
Section: Gaze-tracking Apps On Robot and Mobile Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was trained with 2000 image/gaze position pairs. A hybrid approach is adopted in [35] in which the iris centres are determined first using circular a Hough transform, followed by refinement using a gradient-aware random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm and ellipse fitting. Eye corners are estimated using Gabor jets [36] and tracked using optical flow with normalized cross-correlation.…”
Section: B Gaze Estimation From Low Resolution Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, an ellipse is fit to the pupil using RANSAC. Wood and Bulling [25], as well as George and Routray [11], have a similar scheme but employ a voting-based approach to get an initial eye center estimate. Fuhl et alpropose the Excuse [9] and Else [10] algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first, predominant, category consists of hand-crafted model fitting methods. These techniques employ the appearance, such as the darkness of the pupil, and/or the circular shape of the pupil and the iris for detection [3,9,10,11,16,19,20,22,24,25]. These methods are typically accurate but often lack robustness in more challenging settings, such as low resolution or noisy images and poor illumination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%