2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.045126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and accurate approximate quasiparticle band structure calculations of ZnO, CdO, and MgO polymorphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
7
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7a with a value of E g(WZ-ZnO) = 3.35 eV, very close to that reported in literature for single crystal WZ-ZnO. The resulting equation is: 87 A similar result can also be obtained by assuming a value of χ (Mg) = 1.30 and leaving unchanged the A and B values also for ZB-MgO.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…7a with a value of E g(WZ-ZnO) = 3.35 eV, very close to that reported in literature for single crystal WZ-ZnO. The resulting equation is: 87 A similar result can also be obtained by assuming a value of χ (Mg) = 1.30 and leaving unchanged the A and B values also for ZB-MgO.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…We have to mention that indirect bandgap values ranging between 1.1 and 4.5 eV have been calculated by DFT for RS-ZnO. 87 The data shown in Figures 5a and 5b seem to confirm the general validity of the correlation between E g and the square of the difference of Pauling electronegativity between oxygen and the cationic average electronegativity initially proposed 9 We like to stress that: a) theoretical data calculated by using Eq. 7 (green triangles in Figure 6a) are close to experimental values of mixed oxides in both crystallographic systems (rock-salt structure up to 50at% in Mg content for stable phases and wurtzite structure with Mg content ≤ 20at%) by using as electronegativity parameters 83 Data shown in Figure 6a support the usefulness of the use of Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Ref. 51, non-standard ionization levels for the correction potential (other than 1/4 or 1/2) have been used. The character of the atomic orbital contributions to the VBM is used to determine the ionization levels (normalized to 1/2 across both atomic species).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%