2017
DOI: 10.1101/gr.214270.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads

Abstract: The assembly of long reads from Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies typically requires resource-intensive error-correction and consensus-generation steps to obtain high-quality assemblies. We show that the error-correction step can be omitted and that high-quality consensus sequences can be generated efficiently with a SIMD-accelerated, partial-order alignment-based, stand-alone consensus module called Racon. Based on tests with PacBio and Oxford Nanopore data sets, we show that Racon coupled … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1,950
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,427 publications
(1,952 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
1,950
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Miniasm requires four rounds of Quiver polishing (Chin et al 2013) before the assembly quality converges, whereas Canu requires only a single polishing round and is ultimately fastest to generate a polished assembly (Table 1; Supplemental Note 9; Supplemental Tables S8-S11). To test if Miniasm polishing could be accelerated using a different algorithm, we tested the recently released Racon tool (Vaser et al 2017), which was designed for this purpose. However, on C. elegans, two rounds of Racon required 60 CPU hours and produced a lower-quality consensus than a single round of Quiver, which required a comparable 110 CPU hours.…”
Section: Pacbio Sequence Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Miniasm requires four rounds of Quiver polishing (Chin et al 2013) before the assembly quality converges, whereas Canu requires only a single polishing round and is ultimately fastest to generate a polished assembly (Table 1; Supplemental Note 9; Supplemental Tables S8-S11). To test if Miniasm polishing could be accelerated using a different algorithm, we tested the recently released Racon tool (Vaser et al 2017), which was designed for this purpose. However, on C. elegans, two rounds of Racon required 60 CPU hours and produced a lower-quality consensus than a single round of Quiver, which required a comparable 110 CPU hours.…”
Section: Pacbio Sequence Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the massive read lengths and increased error rate of these new technologies have also required updated assembly methods. This issue includes three new assembly tools designed specifically for long-read PacBio and Nanopore data: Canu , HINGE (Kamath et al 2017), and Racon (Vaser et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed nanopore sequencing on each line using a single R9.4 flow cell (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1) and assembled each genome using minimap/miniasm followed by three rounds of racon [25] and one round of Pilon [26]. We assembled the three lines into 40 contigs (Col-0; longest 16 Table 2).…”
Section: Assembly Of Highly Contiguous Genomes From Minion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%