2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and accurate numerical method for predicting gas chromatography retention time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While publications focused on estimating/improving estimations of thermodynamic parameters and predicting retention times in GC and GC × GC appeared over the years , only a few specifically included peak width prediction. In the early 2000s, Lomsugarit and coworkers divided the adjusted peak width, w R ′, into hold‐up width, w M , and unadjusted peak width, w R .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While publications focused on estimating/improving estimations of thermodynamic parameters and predicting retention times in GC and GC × GC appeared over the years , only a few specifically included peak width prediction. In the early 2000s, Lomsugarit and coworkers divided the adjusted peak width, w R ′, into hold‐up width, w M , and unadjusted peak width, w R .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of methods existing in the literature that have been used to predict the retention times of analytes and/or enable transfer of retention data between columns [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. These methods typically relate retention times to thermodynamic parameters, retention indices or structural molecular descriptors (as is the case with qualitative structure retention relationship, QSRR, models).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, thermodynamic methods are much more amenable to modeling comprehensive 2-D GC (GC × GC) separations when compared to the isovolatility curve generation methods that are required for use of the retention index in the second dimension of a GC × GC separation [7,19]. In the literature, a number of studies to predict retention time using thermodynamic-based models have been reported [1,5,7,[10][11][12][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, there is room for improvement, especially with regard to translation of retention time predictions across columns (of the same stationary phase chemistry) with varying geometries, and translation between different instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model was used to investigate the interaction between analyte and carrier gas inside capillary column with a specific stationary phase, expressed by the relationship between ∆G and k. The temperature dependence of ∆G can be established by the basic thermodynamic relationship as mentioned in equation 7 [28][29][30].…”
Section: Logk = Ee + Ss + Aa + Bb + Ll + C (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%