2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Automated Segmentation for the Three-Directional Multi-Slice Cine Myocardial Velocity Mapping

Abstract: Three-directional cine multi-slice left ventricular myocardial velocity mapping (3Dir MVM) is a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) technique that allows the assessment of cardiac motion in three orthogonal directions. Accurate and reproducible delineation of the myocardium is crucial for accurate analysis of peak systolic and diastolic myocardial velocities. In addition to the conventionally available magnitude CMR data, 3Dir MVM also provides three orthogonal phase velocity mapping datasets, which are used to g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loss. After the cross-modality translation, two fake bSSFP patients with annotated masks (obtained from the cross-modality translation of two LGE patients with the ground truth) and fully real labeled bSSFP patients (35 patients) are used to train our proposed segmentation 3: Performance comparisons for the number of cascade generators on the multicascade pix2pix segmentation network, where "P-L manh " means to use L manh perceptual loss and "simple" means to use cascade generator with the simplified U-net version (where the number of upsampling/downsampling layers in the middle part of the U-net generators is reduced from (8,8,8) to (2,4,5) for generators (G s 2 , G s 3 , G s 4 ), respectively). Table 2 shows the dice score of cardiac LGE segmentation in using different adversarial losses (Vanilla GAN, LSGAN, and WGAN-GP) and different CMMCSegNet generator blocks (U-net and ResNet) and with/without perceptual loss (L manh or L cosine ).…”
Section: Comparisons For Different Choices Of Adversarial Loss and Perceptualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Loss. After the cross-modality translation, two fake bSSFP patients with annotated masks (obtained from the cross-modality translation of two LGE patients with the ground truth) and fully real labeled bSSFP patients (35 patients) are used to train our proposed segmentation 3: Performance comparisons for the number of cascade generators on the multicascade pix2pix segmentation network, where "P-L manh " means to use L manh perceptual loss and "simple" means to use cascade generator with the simplified U-net version (where the number of upsampling/downsampling layers in the middle part of the U-net generators is reduced from (8,8,8) to (2,4,5) for generators (G s 2 , G s 3 , G s 4 ), respectively). Table 2 shows the dice score of cardiac LGE segmentation in using different adversarial losses (Vanilla GAN, LSGAN, and WGAN-GP) and different CMMCSegNet generator blocks (U-net and ResNet) and with/without perceptual loss (L manh or L cosine ).…”
Section: Comparisons For Different Choices Of Adversarial Loss and Perceptualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can see from Figure 1, when the first segmentation network G s 1 obtains the segmentation result of the input fake bSSFP images, if original fake bSSFP image I Y is not used as a con-ditional input in the later G s k+1 , modifying the previous result I k S , G s k+1 extracts fewer features comparing with the G s 1 . To optimize the computational costs, starting from the second generator, we reduce the number of upsampling/downsampling layers in the middle part of the U-net generators from (8,8,8) to (2,4,5) for generators (G s 2 , G s 3 , G s 4 ), respectively. From Table 3, we observe that the proposed network with the simplified U-net versions can improve the segmentation results.…”
Section: Comparisons For Different Choices Of Adversarial Loss and Perceptualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surrogate endpoints for physicians’ fatigue, like detection of pathology and diagnosis accuracy [ 15 ], could benefit from the help of artificial intelligence (AI) [ 16 , 17 ]. Over the past few decades, several AI-algorithms have proven their performance in radiology [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], reducing the number of missed findings and false-positive findings (FPs) [ 23 ]. Furthermore, automated pathology detection allows radiologists to put their capacities into more complex tasks, such as making the final diagnosis [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During its search iteration process, the particles constantly adjust their respective directions through mutual communication and learning, but no matter how scattered they are, they eventually gather in one direction. In this process, the information sharing mechanism between groups is employed to exchange information, and the optimal solution is found through individual cooperation [ 7 ]. Since it has been proposed, many researchers have paid attention to the improvement and optimization of PSO and applied it to practical problems due to its intelligent idea, simple and easy implementation process, and fast search speed of examples [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%