2024
DOI: 10.1109/access.2024.3369900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Efficient Lung Abnormality Identification With Explainable AI: A Comprehensive Framework for Chest CT Scan and X-Ray Images

Md. Zahid Hasan,
Sidratul Montaha,
Inam Ullah Khan
et al.

Abstract: A novel automated multi-classification approach is proposed for the anticipation of lung abnormalities using chest X-ray and CT images. The study leverages a publicly accessible dataset with an insufficient and unbalanced number of images, addressing this issue by employing the data augmentation approach DCGAN to balance the dataset. Various preprocessing procedures are applied to improve features and reduce noise in lung pictures. As the base for the model, the vision trans-former and convolution-based compac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In binary classifications [9,14,16,17,20,21], Liang et al [19] achieved an impressive highest accuracy of 98.5% for COVID-19 and normal, while Jin et al [16] recorded a comparatively lower accuracy of 80.0% for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. For multi-class classification [5,8,[10][11][12][13]15,20], Nahiduzzaman et al [15] addressed 17 classes but did not achieve remarkable accuracy, reaching only 90.92%. Kufel et al [12] achieved a lower accuracy of 84.28% for classifying fifteen classes of chest X-ray images.…”
Section: Comparison With Several Existing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In binary classifications [9,14,16,17,20,21], Liang et al [19] achieved an impressive highest accuracy of 98.5% for COVID-19 and normal, while Jin et al [16] recorded a comparatively lower accuracy of 80.0% for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. For multi-class classification [5,8,[10][11][12][13]15,20], Nahiduzzaman et al [15] addressed 17 classes but did not achieve remarkable accuracy, reaching only 90.92%. Kufel et al [12] achieved a lower accuracy of 84.28% for classifying fifteen classes of chest X-ray images.…”
Section: Comparison With Several Existing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging techniques such as chest X-rays, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) scans, and echocardiograms are essential for diagnosing lung diseases [7]. Chest X-rays are cost-effective, user-friendly, and faster than CT scans and other diagnostic techniques, providing extensive patient information [8]. Medical professionals widely use X-rays to diagnose various conditions, including fractures, cancer, pneumonia, and dental issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%