2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0218001416600041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Parallel Summed Area Table for Fabric Defect Detection

Abstract: Automating fabric defect detection has a signi¯cant role in fabric industries. However, the existing fabric defect detection algorithms lack the real-time performance that is required in real applications due to their high demanding computation. To ensure real time, high accuracy and reliable fabric defect detection this paper developed a fast and parallel normalized cross-correlation algorithm based on summed-area table technique called PFDD-SAT. To meet real-time requirements, extensive use of the NVIDIA CUD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods failed to detect all the faults, especially the tiny ones [ 4 ]. This motivated researchers [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] to develop computer vision systems that are able to detect and classify defects in ceramic tiles [ 5 ], textile fabrics [ 9 , 10 ] and steel industries [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 ]. Structure-based methods extract image structure features such as texture, skeleton and edge, while other methods succeed to extract statistical features, such as mean, difference and variance [ 13 ], from the defect surface and then apply machine learning algorithms to train these features to recognize defected surfaces [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods failed to detect all the faults, especially the tiny ones [ 4 ]. This motivated researchers [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ] to develop computer vision systems that are able to detect and classify defects in ceramic tiles [ 5 ], textile fabrics [ 9 , 10 ] and steel industries [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 ]. Structure-based methods extract image structure features such as texture, skeleton and edge, while other methods succeed to extract statistical features, such as mean, difference and variance [ 13 ], from the defect surface and then apply machine learning algorithms to train these features to recognize defected surfaces [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%