2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2019.8793718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Robust Initialization for Visual-Inertial SLAM

Abstract: Visual-inertial SLAM (VI-SLAM) requires a good initial estimation of the initial velocity, orientation with respect to gravity and gyroscope and accelerometer biases. In this paper we build on the initialization method proposed by Martinelli [1] and extended by Kaiser et al. [2], modifying it to be more general and efficient. We improve accuracy with several rounds of visual-inertial bundle adjustment, and robustify the method with novel observability and consensus tests, that discard erroneous solutions. Our … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the multimodal sensor calibration problem can be solved by modeling it as an optimization problem. The importance of the accuracy of optimization initials has been thoroughly discussed in many works [24]- [26] , which have demonstrated that an accurate optimization result requires a robust initialization procedure to obtain reliable initials. Consequently, the two-step calibration scheme has become the most popular framework for auto-calibration of multisensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the multimodal sensor calibration problem can be solved by modeling it as an optimization problem. The importance of the accuracy of optimization initials has been thoroughly discussed in many works [24]- [26] , which have demonstrated that an accurate optimization result requires a robust initialization procedure to obtain reliable initials. Consequently, the two-step calibration scheme has become the most popular framework for auto-calibration of multisensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the disadvantages, several online methods were developed. The online methods assumed that the measurements from a camera and an IMU were well synchronized (e.g., [14][15][16][17][18][19]), or the extrinsic spatial parameter was known in advance (e.g., [20][21][22]), or both conditions were satisfied (e.g., [23][24][25][26][27][28]). In the case where both the measurements from different sensors are asynchronous and the extrinsic spatial parameter between different sensors is unknown, most of the existing methods [29][30][31][32][33][34] are designed for filter-based VIOs since they are usually built on the Multi-State Constraint Kalman Filter (MSCKF [35]) framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early studies, several initialization methods have been studied, such as the representative joint methods [17][18][19] and disjoint methods [16,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In later research, it is improved by Kaiser et al with a little bit of precision that is sacrificed [18]. The method in [19] suffers a low initialization recall; it only works in twenty percent of the trajectory points, which might be a problem for the robot applications in case the system needs to be launched immediately (ii) The disjoint method is first introduced by Murartal and Tardos [16] and latter adapted by Qin and Shen and Yang and Shen [20,21] with a good performance. In both cases, the parameters of IMU are estimated in different steps by solving a series of linear formulas with the least-squares method such as Gauss-Newton (G-N) and Levenberg-Marquardt (L-M) [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%