2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/8404092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Sensitive Method for Determination of Domoic Acid in Mussel Tissue

Abstract: Domoic acid (DA), a neurotoxic amino acid produced by diatoms, is the main cause of amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP). In this work, we propose a very simple and fast analytical method to determine DA in mussel tissue. The method consists of two consecutive extractions and requires no purification steps, due to a reduction of the extraction of the interfering species and the application of very sensitive and selective HILIC-MS/MS method. The procedural method was validated through the estimation of trueness, e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of knowledge of the toxicokinetics of DA is largely due to limited bioanalytical methods to measure DA. LC-MS/MS methods exist for measuring DA in seawater and in contaminated seafood (Wang et al, 2012;Barbaro et al, 2016), but these methods lack the sensitivity needed to quantify DA in biological samples after low level exposure (Frame and Lefebvre, 2013). ELISA can measure DA at concentrations down to 0.4 ng/ml in biologic specimens (Frame and Lefebvre, 2013), but the ELISA also crossreacts with antibodies against DA, decreasing the usefulness of this assay following chronic exposures (Lefebvre et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of knowledge of the toxicokinetics of DA is largely due to limited bioanalytical methods to measure DA. LC-MS/MS methods exist for measuring DA in seawater and in contaminated seafood (Wang et al, 2012;Barbaro et al, 2016), but these methods lack the sensitivity needed to quantify DA in biological samples after low level exposure (Frame and Lefebvre, 2013). ELISA can measure DA at concentrations down to 0.4 ng/ml in biologic specimens (Frame and Lefebvre, 2013), but the ELISA also crossreacts with antibodies against DA, decreasing the usefulness of this assay following chronic exposures (Lefebvre et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the results validated the working of ic-ELISA in complex matrix, showed insignificant levels of DA toxin found in the shellfish samples, and hence these samples were not contaminated and safe for the human consumption [ 8 ]. The ic-ELISA established in this study showed higher sensitivity demonstrating lower DA level in real shellfish samples (4 ng/g) compared with lower sensitivity exhibited previously by instrumental detection methods i.e., LC-MS/MS (9 ng/g) [ 37 ], LC-UV (6 ng/g) [ 38 ], respectively. Therefore, the results showed that the 1C3 mAb secreted by 1C3 hybridoma could be used to develop an ic-ELISA kit for the detection of DA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Water samples processing and analysis Lake samples, previously analyzed by ELISA test, were also analyzed using HPLC-MS/MS instrumental method developed by Gambaro et al [23]. The pre-analytical procedure for lake water samples is quite similar than the protocol for a neurotoxin domoic acid in water samples developed by Barbaro et al [24]. An aliquot of lake water was acidified with 2 % of formic acid and was then spiked with 50 ng of the ENK internal standard in a 500-mL volumetric flask; the sample was then brought to volume with sample.…”
Section: Hplc-esi-ms/ms Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%