2004
DOI: 10.1002/qua.20160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and stable algorithm for analytical evaluation of two‐center overlap integrals over Slater‐type orbitals with integer and noninteger principal quantum numbers

Abstract: ABSTRACT:A unified algorithm is presented for analytical evaluation of two-center overlap integrals over Slater-type orbitals with integer and noninteger principal quantum numbers. Two-center overlap integrals are expressed as finite sum of Gaunt coefficients and auxiliary functions S n,nЈ L ( p, t). Special attention is paid to the efficient calculation of this auxiliary function by introducing analytic and recurrence relations. In order to test the accuracy of the formula for two-center overlap integrals, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above expression has been extensively used by many authors [110,113,114] who presented explicit expressions for the coefficients B n a n b k (the so-called generalized binomial coefficients). We found it simpler to tabulate these coefficients as series of one-dimensional lookup tables.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The above expression has been extensively used by many authors [110,113,114] who presented explicit expressions for the coefficients B n a n b k (the so-called generalized binomial coefficients). We found it simpler to tabulate these coefficients as series of one-dimensional lookup tables.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the late of 90s one more attempt was made by Mekelleche and Baba−Ahmed [70,71]. Due to lack of benchmark values for the integrals then, a tremendous number of papers were published (Mostly by Guseinov, his co−workers [72][73][74][75][76][77][78] and Ozdogan, his co−workers [79][80][81][82]. We only cite here, those that are noteworthy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of non-Gaussian basis sets with improved cusp properties is illustrated most starkly by considering the current use 18 of Slater basis sets [19][20][21] for specific purposes despite the very long integral evaluation times, 22,23 as well as more generally in the Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF) program. 24 Thus, despite more than 80 yr of investigation, [25][26][27][28] research is still undertaken [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] to improve integral evaluation for Slatertype orbitals to make these calculations competitive with all-Gaussian calculations. Given this, mixed ramp-Gaussian basis sets arguably encapsulate the best of both worlds: characteristics similar to all-Slater basis sets with the potential to match or better all-Gaussian calculation speeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%