SPWLA 60th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions 2019
DOI: 10.30632/t60als-2019_ffff
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Bayesian Inversion Method for the Generalized Petrophysical and Compositional Interpretation of Multiple Well Logs With Uncertainty Quantification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First and foremost we verify the method on deep EM measurements. When the positions of the boundaries are assumed known, our interpretation is qualitatively similar to earlier work: estimation is less certain in geological configurations with thin layers and high contrast between each layer's petrophysical properties [Deng et al, 2019]. Furthermore, the presented results indicate that the method is capable of reducing boundary and property uncertainties within the expected range of sensitivities of the modeled deep EM tool: with low uncertainties when the boundary is within 15 m from the tool [Larsen et al, 2019, ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First and foremost we verify the method on deep EM measurements. When the positions of the boundaries are assumed known, our interpretation is qualitatively similar to earlier work: estimation is less certain in geological configurations with thin layers and high contrast between each layer's petrophysical properties [Deng et al, 2019]. Furthermore, the presented results indicate that the method is capable of reducing boundary and property uncertainties within the expected range of sensitivities of the modeled deep EM tool: with low uncertainties when the boundary is within 15 m from the tool [Larsen et al, 2019, ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This means that the total number of forward runs is as low as 3×40 = 120, compare to 10000 needed for the MCMC. Figure 3 shows that by decreasing layer thicknesses, the value of the posterior standard deviation increases; as expected because of the higher relative impact of shoulder bed effects [Deng et al, 2019, ].…”
Section: Bulk Density Estimationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 The combination of the quasi-Newton methods and Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling methods (QNMCMC) was used to improve the accuracy of joint inversion and evaluate formation properties. 22 However, the methods mentioned above did not consider the effects of high temperature and high pressure on the inversion process, and they were not used to evaluate CO 2 saturation level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs were used in combination with logging parameters such as density, Sigma (neutron capture cross section), HI (hydrogen index), migration length, PEF, and neutron porosity measurements for joint inversion . The combination of the quasi-Newton methods and Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling methods (QNMCMC) was used to improve the accuracy of joint inversion and evaluate formation properties . However, the methods mentioned above did not consider the effects of high temperature and high pressure on the inversion process, and they were not used to evaluate CO 2 saturation level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%