Fast bound and pore water mapping of cortical bone with arbitrary slice oriented two‐dimensional ultra‐short echo time

Abstract

Purpose Extend fast, two‐dimensional (2D) methods of bound and pore water mapping in bone to arbitrary slice orientation. Methods To correct for slice profile artifacts caused by gradient errors of half pulse 2D ultra‐short echo time (UTE), we developed a library of predistorted gradient waveforms that can be used to interpolate optimized gradient waveforms for 2D UTE slice selection. We also developed a method to estimate and correct for a bulk phase difference between the two half pulse excitations used for 2D UTE signal excitation. Bound water images were acquired in three healthy subjects with adiabatic inversion recovery prepared 2D UTE, while pore water images were acquired after short‐T2 signals were suppressed with double adiabatic inversion recovery preparation. The repeatability of bound and pore water imaging with 2D UTE was tested by repeating acquisitions after repositioning. Results The library‐based interpolation of optimized slice select gradient waveforms combined with the method to estimate bulk phase between two excitations provided compact slice profiles for half pulse excited 2D UTE. Quantitative bound and pore water values were highly repeatable—the pooled SD of bound water across all three subjects was 0.38 mol 1$$ {}^1 $$H/L, while pooled SD of pore water was 0.30 mol 1$$ {}^1 $$H/L. Conclusion Fast, quantitative, 2D UTE‐based bound and pore water images can be acquired at arbitrary oblique orientations after correcting for errors in the slice select gradient waveform and bulk phase shift between the two half acquisitions.

Fast dual-echo estimation of apparent long T2 fraction using ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging in tibialis tendons and its osteoporosis-related differences in women

“…Notably, the required time for dual-echo UTE MRI sequence depends on the acquisition techniques. For example, two-dimensional (2D) UTE acquisition ( 32 , 33 ) is faster than a three-dimensional (3D) acquisition (using radial, spiral, or cones trajectories) ( 22 , 34 ), while among the 3D acquisitions, the spiral or Cones is faster than a radial technique. Moreover, the UTE scan time can be improved by several acceleration techniques such as the stretching spokes in Cones ( 35 ), compressed sensing ( 36 - 38 ), and parallel imaging ( 39 , 40 ).…”

High-Sensitivity, Low-Field 19F-MRI Approach Using High Manganese Ferrite Concentrations

“…Cortical bone tissue with a fast decay signal 22 is an ideal organism matter for testing the short-T 2 imaging capacity of the KSSI sequence. 1 H imaging of swine rib bone confirmed that the TE can be shortened to the hardware performance limitation and demonstrated the feasibility of KSSI 1 H imaging for short-T 2 material or biological tissue.…”

MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects

“…The signal ratio calculation in dual-echo UTE imaging ( 20 ) and the signal ratio between UTE and inversion recovery UTE (IR-UTE) ( 21 ) are two remarkable examples of rapid UTE-based bone evaluation techniques, each of which takes less than 5 minutes. Notably, the required time for such measurements depends on the UTE acquisition techniques, which can be two-dimensional (2D) (using cartesian or radial trajectories) ( 22 , 23 ) or three-dimensional (3D) (using cartesian, radial, spiral, or cones trajectories) ( 10 ). Generally, a 2D UTE sequence is faster than a 3D UTE sequence, and a spiral acquisition is faster than a radial or cartesian acquisition.…”