2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.047
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast charging of an electric vehicle lithium-ion battery at the limit of the lithium deposition process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During aging testing, the protocol was programmed to keep the charging time from 0% to 80% SoC constant, as proposed by Sieg et al [ 11 ] Every 50 cycles a characterization was applied and the SoH was measured. For the following cycles, the current was scaled down according to the determined SoHIstep,new=SoH*Istep,old…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During aging testing, the protocol was programmed to keep the charging time from 0% to 80% SoC constant, as proposed by Sieg et al [ 11 ] Every 50 cycles a characterization was applied and the SoH was measured. For the following cycles, the current was scaled down according to the determined SoHIstep,new=SoH*Istep,old…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding the best fast charging protocol for a given battery has been the focus of various publications. [ 10–20 ] The aim is to have a minimal charging time without increased aging or at least an acceptable compromise of both. Maximum charging efficiency can also be an important factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, both capacity retention and mechanical stability of the batteries were greatly improved while the total charging times remained similar to those using the conventional 2 C CCCV charging. Besides, Sieg et al proposed a fast‐charging protocol that allows the maximum charging rate without Li plating by inserting a constant‐potential charging step at 0 V vs. Li/Li + of the graphite anode into the standard CCCV protocol. By embedding a Li reference electrode into the cell, they were able to first CC‐charge the cell until the potential of the graphite anode reached 0 V vs. Li/Li + , then maintained the potential of the graphite anode at 0 V vs Li/Li + until the cell's voltage reached the upper limit, and finally CV‐charged until the end.…”
Section: Challenges and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIB manufacturers recommend small charging currents and conservative cutoff voltages to prevent rapid degradation during charging. On the other hand, EV applications demand fast charging 44,45 . Fast charging with high current could increase the occurrence of lithium plating and other degradations 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%