1990
DOI: 10.1109/59.99396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast decoupled load flow: hypothesis, derivations, and testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
34
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the power flow problem is solved using the Newton-Raphson method with a direct solver [8], [9], or using the fast decoupled load flow (FDLF) method [10]- [12]. In [6] we showed that the LU factorization-which is used by both these traditional methods-is not viable for very large power flow problems.…”
Section: The Power Flow Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the power flow problem is solved using the Newton-Raphson method with a direct solver [8], [9], or using the fast decoupled load flow (FDLF) method [10]- [12]. In [6] we showed that the LU factorization-which is used by both these traditional methods-is not viable for very large power flow problems.…”
Section: The Power Flow Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FDLF matrix Φ can be seen as an approximate Schur complement of the initial Jacobian matrix [15]. In previous studies Φ has already proven to be a good preconditioner [10], [12], while containing only half the non-zeros of the Jacobian matrix, thus providing benefits in computing time and memory.…”
Section: Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in references [3][4][5][6], efficient load flow algorithms are presented, which are based on fast decoupled load flow. However, since these methods always use fast converging load flow algorithms, the convergence is not guaranteed in heavily loaded systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%