2023
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast deep learning reconstruction techniques for preclinical magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Raffaella Fiamma Cabini,
Leonardo Barzaghi,
Davide Cicolari
et al.

Abstract: We propose a deep learning (DL) model and a hyperparameter optimization strategy to reconstruct T1 and T2 maps acquired with the magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) methodology. We applied two different MRF sequence routines to acquire images of ex vivo rat brain phantoms using a 7‐T preclinical scanner. Subsequently, the DL model was trained using experimental data, completely excluding the use of any theoretical MRI signal simulator. The best combination of the DL parameters was implemented by an automat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IR-FISP was the most accurate in estimating the tissue properties. In [ 60 ], deep learning (DL) models like the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and a Recursive Neural Network (RNN) were trained to calculate T 1 and T 2 values for signal evolution in each voxel; the proposed network was tested on a 7T preclinical scanner on a rat brain phantom. This work demonstrates that proposed DL models such as RNN and MLP are more accurate at quantification when compared to other convolution-based neural networks (UNET, CNN, and CED) and conventional dictionary-matching methods.…”
Section: Emerging Trends In Mrf Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IR-FISP was the most accurate in estimating the tissue properties. In [ 60 ], deep learning (DL) models like the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and a Recursive Neural Network (RNN) were trained to calculate T 1 and T 2 values for signal evolution in each voxel; the proposed network was tested on a 7T preclinical scanner on a rat brain phantom. This work demonstrates that proposed DL models such as RNN and MLP are more accurate at quantification when compared to other convolution-based neural networks (UNET, CNN, and CED) and conventional dictionary-matching methods.…”
Section: Emerging Trends In Mrf Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%