2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast denoising of multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation signal based on improved generalized mathematical morphological filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group 1 of the simulation dataset is used for the simulation dataset, and the first public dataset in this paper is used for the public dataset. Note that for field signals, there is no clean signal to use as a reference (Liu et al 2022a(Liu et al , 2022b. This experiment used the resting EEG as a clean standard signal.…”
Section: Comparison With Tms-eeg Data Analysis Toolboxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Group 1 of the simulation dataset is used for the simulation dataset, and the first public dataset in this paper is used for the public dataset. Note that for field signals, there is no clean signal to use as a reference (Liu et al 2022a(Liu et al , 2022b. This experiment used the resting EEG as a clean standard signal.…”
Section: Comparison With Tms-eeg Data Analysis Toolboxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate labeling of TMS pulses facilitates subsequent identification and elimination of pulse artifacts. However, manual EEG labeling is a time-consuming and subjective task, and the TMS pulses cannot be accurately labeled using an external marker (Zrenner et al 2020, Liu et al 2022a, 2022b. In addition, the interpolation window must be automatically determined in accordance with the various pulse artifacts that are present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%