2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(20000130)21:2<132::aid-jcc5>3.0.co;2-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method

Abstract: The AM1‐BCC method quickly and efficiently generates high‐quality atomic charges for use in condensed‐phase simulations. The underlying features of the electron distribution including formal charge and delocalization are first captured by AM1 atomic charges for the individual molecule. Bond charge corrections (BCCs), which have been parameterized against the HF/6‐31G* electrostatic potential (ESP) of a training set of compounds containing relevant functional groups, are then added using a formalism identical t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
709
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,438 publications
(711 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
709
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…135 Among the protocols they tested, RESP charges from HF/6-31G* performed the best, with a RMS error of 1.04 kcal/mol in hydration free energy of 44 compounds, closely followed (RMSE=1.10 kcal/mol) by semi-empirical charges from an AM1-BCC method tuned to reproduce HF/6-31G* charges. 136,137 Recent calculations using Amber GAFF parameters for 504 neutral molecules reported a RMSE of 1.24 kcal/mol and a correlation of 0.89 between simulation and experimental values. 138 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…135 Among the protocols they tested, RESP charges from HF/6-31G* performed the best, with a RMS error of 1.04 kcal/mol in hydration free energy of 44 compounds, closely followed (RMSE=1.10 kcal/mol) by semi-empirical charges from an AM1-BCC method tuned to reproduce HF/6-31G* charges. 136,137 Recent calculations using Amber GAFF parameters for 504 neutral molecules reported a RMSE of 1.24 kcal/mol and a correlation of 0.89 between simulation and experimental values. 138 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79,80 For the evaluation of the MM energy functional, the general Amber force field (GAFF) 81 was used where the corresponding MM parameters were generated by the A program 82 using the AM1-BCC charge scheme. 83,84 The electrostatic and van der Waals terms were not cut off, and only those bonded terms were retained which contained at least one MM or MM host atom. Residual charges which come from zeroing the charges of the QM and MM host atoms were distributed equally among all MM atoms.…”
Section: A Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charges for standard residues in RNAs are taken from AMBER ff14SB 80, 81 and charges for nonstandard residues, including ligand for the A-riboswitch, are calculated using the ANTECHAMBER module with the AM1-BCC charges. 82, 83 In order to test the sensitivity of the different partial charge assignment methods, we also use PDB2PQR method 84 to calculate the partial charges for the 58-nt fragment of rRNA with AMBER99, 85 CHARMM22, 86 or PARSE 87 force fields.…”
Section: The Pctbi Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%