2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2015.7139781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast embedded feet pose estimation based on a depth camera for smart walker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The position of the foot was determined to be its centroid, whereas the orientation was found using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The position error along the anterior-posterior direction and the orientation error with respect to the vertical axis were less than 31 mm and 22 Root Mean Square Deviation %, respectively for healthy subjects [20] and 40.1 mm for the position error along the forward for older adults [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The position of the foot was determined to be its centroid, whereas the orientation was found using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The position error along the anterior-posterior direction and the orientation error with respect to the vertical axis were less than 31 mm and 22 Root Mean Square Deviation %, respectively for healthy subjects [20] and 40.1 mm for the position error along the forward for older adults [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The authors then used the Markov Chain model and Support Vector Machine (SVM) to identify walking patterns. Without the use of modeling, the feet can still be directly extracted from the depth image [20,21]. The position of the foot was determined to be its centroid, whereas the orientation was found using Principal Component Analysis (PCA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that a joint angle difference of more than 5 • is considered a clinically significant difference for gait analysis [55], we claim the accuracy of our CoLiTrack approach to be sufficient. In comparison, results from instrumented crutches [56] as well as from a smart walker (rollator + depth camera) [57] using principal component analysis to estimate the shank angle showed deviations of up to 10 • . Moreover, our real-world experiment demonstrated that neither ground reflectance nor clutter has an influence on CoLiTrack performance.…”
Section: Advantages Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…LIDAR sensors combined with wearable ones (Weon and Lee, 2018) have been used to analyse the kinematics of lower limbs and measure feet orientation. Page et al (2015) also resorted to a depth camera for feet position and orientation detection. Lv et al (2020) used multi-channel proximity sensors to determine each leg's distance and velocity.…”
Section: Human Motion Decoding In Smart Walkersmentioning
confidence: 99%