2020
DOI: 10.1002/mop.32738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast evaluation of lightning electromagnetic fields based on matrix pencil method in time domain

Abstract: The time domain expression of the lightning electromagnetic fields (LEMF) contains multiple integration processes, and the direct solution tends to take up a lot of calculation time. In this paper, the structure of the time domain expression of the LEMF is analyzed, the idea that using the matrix pencil method to realize the fast evaluation of the LEMF is proposed, and the feasibility of this method for calculating the LEMF is discussed. Besides, several numerical examples are given to prove the efficiency and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the matrix pencil method (MPM) is also an excellent frequency domain fitting technique. This method realizes the fast fitting of frequency domain data by expressing frequency domain signals in the sum of rational functions 10,11 . Compared with the VF method, the staring poles are not required by the MPM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the matrix pencil method (MPM) is also an excellent frequency domain fitting technique. This method realizes the fast fitting of frequency domain data by expressing frequency domain signals in the sum of rational functions 10,11 . Compared with the VF method, the staring poles are not required by the MPM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method realizes the fast fitting of frequency domain data by expressing frequency domain signals in the sum of rational functions. 10,11 Compared with the VF method, the staring poles are not required by the MPM. Moreover, the number of poles can be artificially determined according to the data accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%