2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast evaluation of pressure and saturation predictions with a deep learning surrogate flow model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the spatial correlation between pixels within the image signal is ignored when using MSE alone as a fidelity measure. To more accurately measure the fidelity of the surrogate model, we introduced SSIM [15] with reference to previous studies [5,16,17]. The SSIM proposed by Wang et al [15,18] forms a local SSIM by comparing local image blocks at the same location of two image signals.…”
Section: Variable Loss Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the spatial correlation between pixels within the image signal is ignored when using MSE alone as a fidelity measure. To more accurately measure the fidelity of the surrogate model, we introduced SSIM [15] with reference to previous studies [5,16,17]. The SSIM proposed by Wang et al [15,18] forms a local SSIM by comparing local image blocks at the same location of two image signals.…”
Section: Variable Loss Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have applied image-based approaches and snapshots of simulation data over a spatially discretized input domain for surrogate modeling of subsurface flow and transport problems. Most of these works leverage convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to learn the nonlinear mappings from the input properties (e.g., permeability) to the output states (pressure and saturation) on regular Cartesian meshes (Mo et al 2019;Tang et al 2020;Wang and Lin 2020;Wen et al 2021;Zhang et al 2021;Jiang et al 2021;Yan et al 2022;Maldonado-Cruz and Pyrcz 2022). While CNNs are powerful in approximating PDE solutions, they are restricted to a specific discretization of the physical domain in which they are trained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%