“…We experimentally evaluated the efficiency of our proposed method, the GS method, in terms of its computation time by comparing the following three baseline methods including our previous methods: the first method, which only employs the Lazy Evaluation (LE) technique (Leskovec et al 2007), is referred to as the (a) LE method; the second method, which employs LE, medoid pruning, and outlier pivot pruning techniques (Fushimi et al 2016b), is called the (b) Pivot Pruning (PP) method, where we set the number of outlier pivots to 10; and the third method, based on the Transfer Learning (TL) technique mentioned in Section 4, is called the (c) TL method (Fushimi et al 2017c). In our experiments, we changed the number of medoids, K, from 2 to 10, the number of dimensionalities of the functional vectors, S, to 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000, and set the number of source networks, M = 14, in the GS method.…”