2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72150-7_98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Extraction Method of Functional Clusters from Large-Scale Spatial Networks Based on Transfer Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We experimentally evaluated the efficiency of our proposed method, the GS method, in terms of its computation time by comparing the following three baseline methods including our previous methods: the first method, which only employs the Lazy Evaluation (LE) technique (Leskovec et al 2007), is referred to as the (a) LE method; the second method, which employs LE, medoid pruning, and outlier pivot pruning techniques (Fushimi et al 2016b), is called the (b) Pivot Pruning (PP) method, where we set the number of outlier pivots to 10; and the third method, based on the Transfer Learning (TL) technique mentioned in Section 4, is called the (c) TL method (Fushimi et al 2017c). In our experiments, we changed the number of medoids, K, from 2 to 10, the number of dimensionalities of the functional vectors, S, to 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000, and set the number of source networks, M = 14, in the GS method.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Computation Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We experimentally evaluated the efficiency of our proposed method, the GS method, in terms of its computation time by comparing the following three baseline methods including our previous methods: the first method, which only employs the Lazy Evaluation (LE) technique (Leskovec et al 2007), is referred to as the (a) LE method; the second method, which employs LE, medoid pruning, and outlier pivot pruning techniques (Fushimi et al 2016b), is called the (b) Pivot Pruning (PP) method, where we set the number of outlier pivots to 10; and the third method, based on the Transfer Learning (TL) technique mentioned in Section 4, is called the (c) TL method (Fushimi et al 2017c). In our experiments, we changed the number of medoids, K, from 2 to 10, the number of dimensionalities of the functional vectors, S, to 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000, and set the number of source networks, M = 14, in the GS method.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Computation Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this difficulty, we proposed an accelerated version of a greedy algorithm for K-medoids clustering, which produces identical results to the original FCE method, by equipping it with some pruning techniques (Fushimi et al 2016b). For further acceleration, by focusing on the structural similarity of urban streets and regarding them as spatial networks, we proposed a transfer learning-based method (Fushimi et al 2017c), which approximates medoid vectors using an already clustered network. We call this a source domain network (source network).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation