1979
DOI: 10.1137/1021093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Fourier Methods in Computational Complex Analysis

Abstract: In this paper we discuss the discrete Fourier transform and point out some computational problems in (mainly) complex analysis where it can be fruitfully applied. We begin by describing the * The John von Neumann Lecture delivered at the SIAM National Meeting, May, 1978.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Criteria for the unique solvability of this system may be obtained with the aid of discrete Fourier analysis. (Here and in the sequel we use the notation and results from the paper of Henrici on fast Fourier algorithms [7].) If we denote by a, s, and / the sequences a = i .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria for the unique solvability of this system may be obtained with the aid of discrete Fourier analysis. (Here and in the sequel we use the notation and results from the paper of Henrici on fast Fourier algorithms [7].) If we denote by a, s, and / the sequences a = i .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up until 1975, this splitting was performed in a way that destroyed the periodicity, namely as log|z(t) − z(s)| = log|t − s| + log z(t) − z(s) t − s (see Hsiao et al, 1980). Then, Henrici suggested using the kernel for the circle as the denominator, giving log|z(t) − z(s)| = log|e it − e is | + log z(t) − z(s) e it − e is (1.4) (see Henrici, 1979;Reichel, 1984Reichel, , 1986, independently came up with the same idea), and used it to analytically solve the equation for the ellipse. In 1975 also, the second author of the present article (Berrut, 1976) and Reichel independently suggested using this splitting in the numerical solution of (1.1) with trigonometric polynomials for general curves (see Henrici, 1986).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume (4) - (6). Due to Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2 we can represent A = B −1 (I − T ), and the Fredholm properties of…”
Section: Preconditioning Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are known and satisfy the conditions (6) where W (b j ) = 1 2π arg b j (t)| t=1 t=0 is the winding number [15] of the function b j , j = 1, 2.…”
Section: Introduction: the Problem And The Purposesmentioning
confidence: 99%